Uruguayan Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Uruguayan
Select to Compare
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Uruguayan Married-Couple Family Poverty
5.4%
POVERTY | MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILIES
25.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
199th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Uruguayan Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,309,932 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.477 and weighted average of 5.4%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Uruguayans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.4% in poverty level among married-couple families.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Uruguayans and poverty level among married-couple families does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Uruguayans influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among married-couple families within an area, or if Uruguayans simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among married-couple families due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Uruguayans by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Uruguayans are Immigrants from Morocco (5.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Lebanese (5.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Belarus (5.4%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (5.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and Liberian (5.4%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Cape Verdeans | 30.7 /100 | #192 | Fair 5.3% |
| Malaysians | 29.5 /100 | #193 | Fair 5.4% |
| Immigrants from Israel | 27.8 /100 | #194 | Fair 5.4% |
| Immigrants from the Azores | 27.5 /100 | #195 | Fair 5.4% |
| Spaniards | 27.4 /100 | #196 | Fair 5.4% |
| Liberians | 26.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 5.4% |
| Immigrants from Belarus | 26.2 /100 | #198 | Fair 5.4% |
| Uruguayans | 25.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 5.4% |
| Immigrants from Morocco | 24.3 /100 | #200 | Fair 5.4% |
| Lebanese | 24.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 5.4% |
| Immigrants from Middle Africa | 23.8 /100 | #202 | Fair 5.4% |
| Immigrants from Peru | 21.8 /100 | #203 | Fair 5.4% |
| Immigrants from Costa Rica | 19.4 /100 | #204 | Poor 5.4% |
| Chippewa | 18.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 5.4% |
| Osage | 18.4 /100 | #206 | Poor 5.4% |
Uruguayan Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Uruguayan Data | Married-Couple Family Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.040% | 0.92% |
| Maximum | 7.7% | 22.4% |
| Range | 7.7% | 21.5% |
| Mean | 2.4% | 6.6% |
| Median | 2.0% | 5.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 0.94% | 4.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.4% | 5.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.4% | 1.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.9% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.9% | 5.5% |
Correlation Details
| Uruguayan Percentile | Sample Size | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.040% | 125,965,241 | 5.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.25% | 11,612,571 | 5.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.42% | 2,714,441 | 5.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.61% | 1,646,999 | 5.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.79% | 838,142 | 4.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.94% | 502,771 | 5.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.13% | 206,670 | 5.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.29% | 255,164 | 6.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.48% | 233,381 | 5.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.68% | 124,627 | 5.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.85% | 71,071 | 5.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.02% | 52,551 | 4.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.23% | 69,004 | 4.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.50% | 9,969 | 2.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.69% | 1,747 | 3.6% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.83% | 1,659 | 5.7% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 3.00% | 1,067 | 0.92% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.36% | 506 | 2.7% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.61% | 887 | 1.1% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.16% | 361 | 19.1% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.79% | 313 | 22.4% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.15% | 179 | 19.0% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.69% | 611 | 6.6% |