Czechoslovakian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Czechoslovakian
Select to Compare
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Czechoslovakian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
15.5%
POVERTY | GIRLS < 16
89.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
135th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czechoslovakian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 361,103,905 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.338 and weighted average of 15.5%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.77% in poverty level among girls under the age of 16.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Czechoslovakians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 within an area, or if Czechoslovakians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Native Hawaiian (15.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Spain (15.5%, a difference of 0.030%), South African (15.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Brazilian (15.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and Mongolian (15.4%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Albanians | 90.5 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Immigrants from South Eastern Asia | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 90.1 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Immigrants from Western Europe | 90.0 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Mongolians | 89.7 /100 | #132 | Excellent 15.4% |
| Brazilians | 89.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 15.4% |
| Immigrants from Spain | 89.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 15.5% |
| Czechoslovakians | 89.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 15.5% |
| Native Hawaiians | 89.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 15.5% |
| South Africans | 88.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 15.5% |
| Immigrants from Vietnam | 88.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 15.5% |
| Armenians | 87.9 /100 | #139 | Excellent 15.5% |
| New Zealanders | 87.2 /100 | #140 | Excellent 15.6% |
| Immigrants from Jordan | 87.2 /100 | #141 | Excellent 15.6% |
| Canadians | 87.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 15.6% |
Czechoslovakian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Czechoslovakian Data | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Data |
| Minimum | 0.078% | 3.3% |
| Maximum | 32.4% | 57.5% |
| Range | 32.3% | 54.2% |
| Mean | 5.5% | 21.9% |
| Median | 4.1% | 17.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.0% | 13.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.8% | 26.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.8% | 13.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.0% | 13.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.9% | 13.4% |
Correlation Details
| Czechoslovakian Percentile | Sample Size | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.078% | 325,574,991 | 16.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.34% | 26,607,284 | 13.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.60% | 5,822,511 | 13.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.85% | 1,720,458 | 13.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.11% | 554,964 | 15.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.36% | 360,237 | 20.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.61% | 165,609 | 15.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.88% | 96,617 | 11.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.13% | 28,679 | 21.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.36% | 21,756 | 23.9% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.56% | 39,509 | 13.6% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.89% | 19,039 | 41.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.09% | 5,769 | 20.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.38% | 11,207 | 19.2% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.67% | 19,780 | 14.0% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.94% | 10,117 | 17.6% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.09% | 12,373 | 9.1% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.39% | 4,759 | 40.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.70% | 2,449 | 15.8% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.79% | 4,255 | 24.2% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.18% | 5,429 | 6.8% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.29% | 2,343 | 7.8% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.63% | 2,538 | 19.9% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.79% | 1,106 | 51.4% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.45% | 2,279 | 28.7% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.11% | 211 | 37.0% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.34% | 109 | 9.1% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.82% | 3,542 | 3.3% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.48% | 1,886 | 20.2% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.90% | 688 | 57.5% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.50% | 526 | 17.2% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.56% | 666 | 52.1% |
[ 32.0% - 32.5% ] 32.42% | 219 | 30.3% |