Pueblo vs Turkish Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Pueblo
Turkish
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Pueblo
Turks
28.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
334th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
36th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pueblo vs Turkish Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 119,546,041 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Pueblo and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.215 and weighted average of 28.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 268,182,441 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.312 and weighted average of 18.7%, a difference of 53.4%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Pueblo | Turkish |
| Minimum | 2.9% | 1.7% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 67.9% |
| Range | 97.1% | 66.2% |
| Mean | 35.5% | 20.0% |
| Median | 32.6% | 16.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 23.2% | 13.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 46.1% | 19.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 22.9% | 6.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 17.5% | 14.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 17.4% | 14.6% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Pueblo by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Pueblo are Ute (28.4%, a difference of 0.73%), Immigrants from Yemen (28.9%, a difference of 1.1%), Yakama (28.3%, a difference of 1.1%), Native/Alaskan (28.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and Colville (29.1%, a difference of 1.6%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 28.2% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 28.3% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 28.4% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 28.6% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 28.9% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 29.1% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 29.4% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 30.3% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 30.4% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 30.6% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 31.3% |
Demographics Similar to Turks by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Armenia (18.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Japan (18.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Korean (18.6%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Philippines (18.6%, a difference of 0.42%), and Immigrants from Sri Lanka (18.6%, a difference of 0.49%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Poland | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 18.5% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 18.5% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 18.6% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 18.6% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 18.6% |
| Koreans | 99.9 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 18.6% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 18.6% |
| Turks | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 18.7% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 18.7% |
| Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Jordanians | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 18.8% |