Navajo Single Mother Poverty

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 222,508,817 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Navajo and poverty level among single mothers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.018 and weighted average of 40.2%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Navajo within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.010% in poverty level among single mothers.

It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Navajo and poverty level among single mothers does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Navajo influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among single mothers within an area, or if Navajo simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among single mothers due to other factors.

Demographics Similar to Navajo by Single Mother Poverty

In terms of single mother poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Navajo are Cajun (40.3%, a difference of 0.33%), Colville (39.3%, a difference of 2.4%), Sioux (38.8%, a difference of 3.7%), Crow (38.6%, a difference of 4.1%), and Pima (38.6%, a difference of 4.2%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Single Mother Poverty
Menominee	0.0 /100 \| #333	Tragic 37.1%
Pueblo	0.0 /100 \| #334	Tragic 37.2%
Yuman	0.0 /100 \| #335	Tragic 37.8%
Cheyenne	0.0 /100 \| #336	Tragic 38.5%
Immigrants from Yemen	0.0 /100 \| #337	Tragic 38.5%
Pima	0.0 /100 \| #338	Tragic 38.6%
Crow	0.0 /100 \| #339	Tragic 38.6%
Sioux	0.0 /100 \| #340	Tragic 38.8%
Colville	0.0 /100 \| #341	Tragic 39.3%
Navajo	0.0 /100 \| #342	Tragic 40.2%
Cajuns	0.0 /100 \| #343	Tragic 40.3%
Tohono O'odham	0.0 /100 \| #344	Tragic 43.0%
Lumbee	0.0 /100 \| #345	Tragic 43.2%
Houma	0.0 /100 \| #346	Tragic 43.5%
Puerto Ricans	0.0 /100 \| #347	Tragic 44.5%

Navajo Single Mother Poverty Correlation Summary

Measurement	Navajo Data	Single Mother Poverty Data
Minimum	0.078%	12.6%
Maximum	100.0%	100.0%
Range	99.9%	87.4%
Mean	49.6%	53.5%
Median	46.4%	49.8%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	12.0%	40.0%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	88.4%	63.1%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	76.5%	23.1%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	36.2%	20.3%
Standard Deviation (Population)	36.1%	20.2%

Correlation Details

Navajo Percentile	Sample Size	Single Mother Poverty
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.078%	207,313,230	30.8%
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.71%	7,402,229	30.1%
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.15%	4,066,774	31.0%
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.72%	968,277	32.8%
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.22%	540,275	29.9%
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.68%	269,487	35.9%
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.11%	755,522	33.9%
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.74%	146,161	32.1%
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.20%	102,077	41.0%
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.56%	35,382	60.5%
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.22%	96,192	46.7%
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.68%	30,944	44.9%
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.22%	9,192	76.8%
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.79%	7,217	94.3%
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.12%	1,039	100.0%
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.86%	41,224	34.5%
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.82%	126,495	40.0%
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.28%	4,858	69.2%
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.80%	17,435	72.1%
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.23%	46,831	35.1%
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.73%	494	40.0%
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.20%	8,832	12.6%
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.73%	452	40.0%
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.22%	4,567	52.9%
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.11%	1,236	57.5%
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.61%	6,302	45.4%
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.03%	343	100.0%
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.84%	962	100.0%
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.76%	411	100.0%
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.89%	4,488	46.8%
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.22%	10,362	26.4%
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.66%	547	100.0%
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.14%	14,980	63.8%
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.37%	291	100.0%
[ 24.0% - 24.5% ] 24.25%	3,345	50.0%
[ 24.5% - 25.0% ] 24.83%	7,430	61.1%
[ 27.0% - 27.5% ] 27.16%	4,834	69.8%
[ 27.5% - 28.0% ] 27.52%	46,457	38.2%
[ 28.5% - 29.0% ] 28.57%	4,858	68.3%
[ 31.0% - 31.5% ] 31.29%	46,398	47.2%
[ 34.0% - 34.5% ] 34.25%	5,317	63.1%
[ 35.0% - 35.5% ] 35.30%	4,842	63.1%
[ 35.5% - 36.0% ] 35.82%	8,943	49.1%
[ 38.5% - 39.0% ] 38.63%	1,504	24.2%
[ 40.0% - 40.5% ] 40.35%	456	100.0%
[ 45.5% - 46.0% ] 45.72%	9,175	44.5%
[ 46.0% - 46.5% ] 46.36%	22,997	47.2%
[ 46.5% - 47.0% ] 46.82%	22,666	45.8%
[ 52.5% - 53.0% ] 52.68%	16,651	50.1%
[ 56.0% - 56.5% ] 56.43%	8,855	26.2%
[ 61.5% - 62.0% ] 61.69%	2,665	78.0%
[ 63.0% - 63.5% ] 63.33%	1,489	54.5%
[ 64.0% - 64.5% ] 64.27%	10,785	28.3%
[ 66.0% - 66.5% ] 66.44%	1,612	42.6%
[ 67.5% - 68.0% ] 67.80%	1,938	47.7%
[ 68.0% - 68.5% ] 68.13%	5,600	49.6%
[ 70.0% - 70.5% ] 70.24%	1,482	55.4%
[ 70.5% - 71.0% ] 70.81%	1,552	23.1%
[ 71.0% - 71.5% ] 71.50%	1,607	46.1%
[ 77.5% - 78.0% ] 77.65%	4,345	58.6%
[ 78.5% - 79.0% ] 78.78%	11,541	29.3%
[ 80.0% - 80.5% ] 80.04%	526	27.3%
[ 80.5% - 81.0% ] 80.57%	211	51.5%
[ 81.5% - 82.0% ] 81.91%	1,039	55.9%
[ 82.5% - 83.0% ] 82.74%	2,653	38.2%
[ 84.0% - 84.5% ] 84.30%	8,372	25.3%
[ 85.0% - 85.5% ] 85.03%	2,945	64.2%
[ 86.0% - 86.5% ] 86.35%	762	62.1%
[ 87.5% - 88.0% ] 87.56%	868	63.6%
[ 88.0% - 88.5% ] 88.28%	435	80.0%
[ 88.5% - 89.0% ] 88.60%	7,238	54.5%
[ 89.0% - 89.5% ] 89.34%	722	82.0%
[ 89.5% - 90.0% ] 89.73%	867	92.0%
[ 90.0% - 90.5% ] 90.22%	2,137	47.9%
[ 90.5% - 91.0% ] 90.84%	11,403	49.6%
[ 91.0% - 91.5% ] 91.07%	9,234	58.7%
[ 91.5% - 92.0% ] 91.68%	8,067	40.2%
[ 92.0% - 92.5% ] 92.32%	8,411	71.0%
[ 92.5% - 93.0% ] 92.75%	19,851	49.4%
[ 93.0% - 93.5% ] 93.34%	3,932	46.0%
[ 93.5% - 94.0% ] 93.90%	6,899	58.2%
[ 94.0% - 94.5% ] 94.20%	26,776	40.1%
[ 94.5% - 95.0% ] 94.64%	5,751	57.3%
[ 95.0% - 95.5% ] 95.36%	13,953	57.4%
[ 95.5% - 96.0% ] 95.81%	9,553	48.3%
[ 96.0% - 96.5% ] 96.30%	6,750	41.8%
[ 96.5% - 97.0% ] 96.72%	16,594	52.9%
[ 97.0% - 97.5% ] 97.23%	2,386	64.5%
[ 97.5% - 98.0% ] 97.87%	9,799	62.5%
[ 98.0% - 98.5% ] 98.34%	3,863	49.8%
[ 98.5% - 99.0% ] 98.90%	5,369	54.3%
[ 99.0% - 99.5% ] 99.29%	11,442	57.2%
[ 99.5% - 100.0% ] 100.00%	5,557	55.7%

Navajo Single Mother Poverty

COMPARE

Navajo Single Mother PovertyTragic

Navajo Single Mother Poverty Correlation Chart

Demographics Similar to Navajo by Single Mother Poverty

Navajo Single Mother Poverty Correlation Summary

Correlation Details

Navajo Single Mother Poverty
Tragic