Navajo Poverty
COMPARE
Navajo
Select to Compare
Poverty
Navajo Poverty
23.1%
POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
345th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Navajo Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,751,709 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Navajo and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.508 and weighted average of 23.1%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Navajo within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.19% in poverty level.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Navajo and poverty level does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Navajo influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level within an area, or if Navajo simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Navajo by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Navajo are Puerto Rican (23.7%, a difference of 2.5%), Lumbee (21.9%, a difference of 5.4%), Pima (21.9%, a difference of 5.6%), Tohono O'odham (24.4%, a difference of 5.7%), and Immigrants from Yemen (21.5%, a difference of 7.3%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 18.4% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 18.4% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 18.9% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 19.4% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 19.8% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 20.2% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 20.7% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 20.8% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 20.8% |
Immigrants from Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 21.5% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 21.9% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 21.9% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 23.1% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 23.7% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 24.4% |
Navajo Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Navajo Data | Poverty Data |
Minimum | 0.078% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 62.6% |
Range | 99.9% | 61.2% |
Mean | 48.5% | 27.2% |
Median | 42.4% | 24.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.8% | 17.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 84.7% | 36.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 68.8% | 19.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 34.4% | 12.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 34.2% | 12.6% |
Correlation Details
Navajo Percentile | Sample Size | Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.078% | 208,963,205 | 13.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.71% | 7,627,685 | 13.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.15% | 4,170,961 | 14.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.73% | 991,466 | 15.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.23% | 656,349 | 14.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.69% | 288,217 | 17.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.12% | 772,218 | 15.9% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.73% | 159,376 | 15.3% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.21% | 106,065 | 23.4% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.56% | 39,506 | 14.1% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.22% | 97,410 | 21.0% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.68% | 31,067 | 12.0% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.25% | 10,630 | 31.4% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.76% | 9,108 | 19.5% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.31% | 7,030 | 8.3% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.86% | 41,224 | 22.7% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.82% | 134,397 | 20.6% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.28% | 4,858 | 20.7% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.81% | 19,204 | 26.5% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.24% | 50,066 | 15.9% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.72% | 2,005 | 26.2% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.21% | 9,287 | 16.4% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.73% | 452 | 34.5% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.28% | 13,859 | 19.0% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.67% | 2,652 | 17.7% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.24% | 3,921 | 11.4% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.29% | 217 | 62.6% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.61% | 6,302 | 29.7% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.03% | 343 | 23.9% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.88% | 1,321 | 43.7% |
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.73% | 705 | 18.8% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.93% | 7,038 | 11.1% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.17% | 3,229 | 16.8% |
[ 19.5% - 20.0% ] 19.69% | 3,591 | 16.7% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.21% | 11,199 | 10.0% |
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.59% | 1,093 | 15.2% |
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.14% | 15,106 | 21.0% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.33% | 583 | 22.8% |
[ 24.0% - 24.5% ] 24.26% | 3,591 | 18.3% |
[ 24.5% - 25.0% ] 24.84% | 7,898 | 22.5% |
[ 25.0% - 25.5% ] 25.12% | 3,308 | 9.1% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.63% | 749 | 45.3% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.52% | 230 | 25.7% |
[ 27.0% - 27.5% ] 27.16% | 4,834 | 29.8% |
[ 27.5% - 28.0% ] 27.52% | 46,457 | 20.8% |
[ 28.5% - 29.0% ] 28.57% | 4,858 | 34.9% |
[ 29.0% - 29.5% ] 29.44% | 394 | 23.1% |
[ 31.0% - 31.5% ] 31.29% | 46,398 | 27.1% |
[ 34.0% - 34.5% ] 34.00% | 100 | 34.4% |
[ 34.0% - 34.5% ] 34.25% | 5,317 | 21.3% |
[ 35.0% - 35.5% ] 35.30% | 4,842 | 23.6% |
[ 35.5% - 36.0% ] 35.82% | 8,943 | 31.6% |
[ 36.0% - 36.5% ] 36.17% | 188 | 20.7% |
[ 36.5% - 37.0% ] 36.54% | 728 | 15.8% |
[ 38.5% - 39.0% ] 38.63% | 1,504 | 24.0% |
[ 39.0% - 39.5% ] 39.15% | 682 | 31.4% |
[ 45.5% - 46.0% ] 45.72% | 9,175 | 21.8% |
[ 46.0% - 46.5% ] 46.36% | 22,997 | 24.4% |
[ 46.5% - 47.0% ] 46.82% | 22,666 | 24.9% |
[ 52.5% - 53.0% ] 52.68% | 16,651 | 28.4% |
[ 53.0% - 53.5% ] 53.06% | 98 | 7.1% |
[ 56.0% - 56.5% ] 56.43% | 8,855 | 21.1% |
[ 58.0% - 58.5% ] 58.03% | 193 | 17.6% |
[ 60.5% - 61.0% ] 60.86% | 304 | 1.3% |
[ 61.0% - 61.5% ] 61.48% | 610 | 7.2% |
[ 61.5% - 62.0% ] 61.69% | 2,665 | 53.9% |
[ 63.0% - 63.5% ] 63.33% | 1,489 | 49.4% |
[ 64.0% - 64.5% ] 64.27% | 10,785 | 14.3% |
[ 66.0% - 66.5% ] 66.44% | 1,612 | 18.1% |
[ 67.5% - 68.0% ] 67.80% | 1,938 | 45.9% |
[ 68.0% - 68.5% ] 68.13% | 5,600 | 44.5% |
[ 69.0% - 69.5% ] 69.30% | 316 | 44.9% |
[ 70.0% - 70.5% ] 70.24% | 1,482 | 39.4% |
[ 70.5% - 71.0% ] 70.81% | 1,552 | 22.8% |
[ 71.0% - 71.5% ] 71.50% | 1,607 | 36.7% |
[ 73.5% - 74.0% ] 73.68% | 494 | 20.0% |
[ 75.0% - 75.5% ] 75.39% | 191 | 5.8% |
[ 77.5% - 78.0% ] 77.65% | 4,345 | 49.4% |
[ 78.5% - 79.0% ] 78.78% | 11,541 | 24.8% |
[ 80.0% - 80.5% ] 80.04% | 526 | 22.1% |
[ 80.5% - 81.0% ] 80.57% | 211 | 45.5% |
[ 81.5% - 82.0% ] 81.91% | 1,039 | 58.2% |
[ 82.5% - 83.0% ] 82.74% | 2,653 | 32.1% |
[ 84.0% - 84.5% ] 84.30% | 8,372 | 22.8% |
[ 85.0% - 85.5% ] 85.03% | 2,945 | 51.1% |
[ 85.5% - 86.0% ] 85.71% | 238 | 5.5% |
[ 86.0% - 86.5% ] 86.35% | 762 | 21.1% |
[ 87.5% - 88.0% ] 87.56% | 868 | 28.3% |
[ 88.0% - 88.5% ] 88.28% | 435 | 31.7% |
[ 88.5% - 89.0% ] 88.61% | 7,409 | 36.7% |
[ 89.0% - 89.5% ] 89.34% | 722 | 48.9% |
[ 89.5% - 90.0% ] 89.73% | 867 | 41.6% |
[ 90.0% - 90.5% ] 90.22% | 2,137 | 27.2% |
[ 90.5% - 91.0% ] 90.84% | 11,403 | 32.4% |
[ 91.0% - 91.5% ] 91.07% | 9,234 | 29.6% |
[ 91.5% - 92.0% ] 91.69% | 8,424 | 37.6% |
[ 92.0% - 92.5% ] 92.32% | 8,411 | 42.1% |
[ 92.5% - 93.0% ] 92.75% | 19,851 | 31.4% |
[ 93.0% - 93.5% ] 93.34% | 3,932 | 42.7% |
[ 93.5% - 94.0% ] 93.92% | 8,846 | 26.6% |
[ 94.0% - 94.5% ] 94.20% | 27,550 | 35.3% |
[ 94.5% - 95.0% ] 94.66% | 6,329 | 39.8% |
[ 95.0% - 95.5% ] 95.36% | 13,953 | 38.2% |
[ 95.5% - 96.0% ] 95.81% | 9,553 | 32.6% |
[ 96.0% - 96.5% ] 96.30% | 6,750 | 37.1% |
[ 96.5% - 97.0% ] 96.72% | 16,594 | 42.7% |
[ 97.0% - 97.5% ] 97.25% | 2,729 | 44.0% |
[ 97.5% - 98.0% ] 97.87% | 9,799 | 44.9% |
[ 98.0% - 98.5% ] 98.34% | 3,915 | 34.9% |
[ 98.5% - 99.0% ] 98.90% | 5,369 | 40.6% |
[ 99.0% - 99.5% ] 99.29% | 11,442 | 43.4% |
[ 99.5% - 100.0% ] 100.00% | 7,309 | 39.2% |