Navajo Births to Unmarried Women
COMPARE
Navajo
Select to Compare
Births to Unmarried Women
Navajo Births to Unmarried Women
51.5%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
344th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Navajo Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 217,645,361 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Navajo and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.440 and weighted average of 51.5%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Navajo within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.33% in percentage of births to unmarried women.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Navajo and percentage of births to unmarried women does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Navajo influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of births to unmarried women within an area, or if Navajo simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of births to unmarried women due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Navajo by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Navajo are Pima (51.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Menominee (51.1%, a difference of 0.74%), Inupiat (52.1%, a difference of 1.2%), Hopi (50.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and Tohono O'odham (49.8%, a difference of 3.3%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 44.3% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 44.4% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 45.3% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 45.7% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 46.6% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 47.1% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 48.2% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 49.8% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 50.8% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 51.1% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 51.5% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 51.5% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 52.1% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 53.7% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 56.4% |
Navajo Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary
Measurement | Navajo Data | Births to Unmarried Women Data |
Minimum | 0.077% | 9.5% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 99.9% | 90.5% |
Mean | 48.7% | 67.3% |
Median | 45.7% | 72.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.5% | 41.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 90.5% | 95.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 80.0% | 54.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 37.5% | 27.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 37.3% | 27.6% |
Correlation Details
Navajo Percentile | Sample Size | Births to Unmarried Women |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.077% | 203,140,574 | 33.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.71% | 7,151,123 | 35.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.15% | 3,906,551 | 36.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.72% | 881,170 | 41.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.22% | 535,518 | 43.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.69% | 259,103 | 54.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.11% | 740,024 | 41.4% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.72% | 120,028 | 48.3% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.20% | 95,511 | 35.8% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.54% | 32,020 | 11.5% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.16% | 67,464 | 35.0% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.66% | 26,206 | 27.6% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.12% | 5,522 | 96.1% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.74% | 3,264 | 100.0% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.89% | 35,729 | 86.2% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.81% | 117,775 | 29.5% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.41% | 1,360 | 14.3% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.80% | 17,435 | 62.3% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.23% | 46,831 | 40.4% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.73% | 494 | 100.0% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.20% | 8,832 | 84.1% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.73% | 452 | 100.0% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.26% | 5,065 | 48.2% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.68% | 2,058 | 29.4% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.11% | 1,236 | 32.1% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.61% | 6,214 | 59.5% |
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.76% | 411 | 100.0% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.27% | 436 | 100.0% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.22% | 10,362 | 16.2% |
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.14% | 14,980 | 41.5% |
[ 24.5% - 25.0% ] 24.83% | 7,430 | 48.5% |
[ 27.0% - 27.5% ] 27.16% | 4,834 | 95.9% |
[ 27.5% - 28.0% ] 27.52% | 46,457 | 30.9% |
[ 31.0% - 31.5% ] 31.29% | 46,398 | 38.7% |
[ 34.0% - 34.5% ] 34.25% | 5,317 | 100.0% |
[ 35.0% - 35.5% ] 35.30% | 4,842 | 100.0% |
[ 35.5% - 36.0% ] 35.82% | 8,943 | 75.4% |
[ 39.0% - 39.5% ] 39.15% | 682 | 100.0% |
[ 45.5% - 46.0% ] 45.72% | 9,175 | 53.5% |
[ 46.0% - 46.5% ] 46.35% | 21,672 | 74.3% |
[ 46.5% - 47.0% ] 46.82% | 22,454 | 74.3% |
[ 52.5% - 53.0% ] 52.69% | 14,688 | 72.6% |
[ 56.0% - 56.5% ] 56.24% | 489 | 9.5% |
[ 64.0% - 64.5% ] 64.27% | 10,785 | 83.8% |
[ 68.0% - 68.5% ] 68.13% | 5,600 | 22.6% |
[ 70.0% - 70.5% ] 70.24% | 1,482 | 100.0% |
[ 70.5% - 71.0% ] 70.81% | 1,552 | 100.0% |
[ 71.0% - 71.5% ] 71.50% | 1,607 | 100.0% |
[ 77.5% - 78.0% ] 77.65% | 4,345 | 95.3% |
[ 78.5% - 79.0% ] 78.78% | 11,541 | 88.2% |
[ 80.0% - 80.5% ] 80.04% | 526 | 50.0% |
[ 80.5% - 81.0% ] 80.57% | 211 | 100.0% |
[ 81.5% - 82.0% ] 81.99% | 594 | 80.8% |
[ 82.5% - 83.0% ] 82.74% | 2,653 | 89.2% |
[ 84.0% - 84.5% ] 84.30% | 8,372 | 89.5% |
[ 85.0% - 85.5% ] 85.03% | 2,945 | 100.0% |
[ 88.5% - 89.0% ] 88.64% | 2,765 | 47.9% |
[ 90.0% - 90.5% ] 90.16% | 1,453 | 87.9% |
[ 90.5% - 91.0% ] 90.85% | 10,385 | 63.9% |
[ 91.0% - 91.5% ] 91.07% | 8,275 | 82.4% |
[ 91.5% - 92.0% ] 91.69% | 8,424 | 72.9% |
[ 92.0% - 92.5% ] 92.32% | 8,246 | 51.9% |
[ 92.5% - 93.0% ] 92.74% | 16,702 | 59.4% |
[ 93.0% - 93.5% ] 93.32% | 1,782 | 91.3% |
[ 93.5% - 94.0% ] 93.96% | 7,313 | 91.1% |
[ 94.0% - 94.5% ] 94.20% | 26,776 | 67.0% |
[ 94.5% - 95.0% ] 94.66% | 5,787 | 73.7% |
[ 95.0% - 95.5% ] 95.36% | 13,953 | 83.6% |
[ 95.5% - 96.0% ] 95.73% | 4,217 | 69.3% |
[ 96.0% - 96.5% ] 96.30% | 6,376 | 100.0% |
[ 96.5% - 97.0% ] 96.73% | 14,906 | 61.1% |
[ 97.0% - 97.5% ] 97.38% | 343 | 100.0% |
[ 97.5% - 98.0% ] 97.90% | 8,228 | 86.2% |
[ 98.0% - 98.5% ] 98.30% | 2,475 | 75.4% |
[ 98.5% - 99.0% ] 98.93% | 4,123 | 58.9% |
[ 99.0% - 99.5% ] 99.30% | 10,389 | 100.0% |
[ 99.5% - 100.0% ] 100.00% | 3,101 | 97.9% |