Latvian In Labor Force | Age > 16
COMPARE
Latvian
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Latvian In Labor Force | Age > 16
65.5%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
89.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
143rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Latvian In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,727,304 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Latvians and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.127 and weighted average of 65.5%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.47% in labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Latvians and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Latvians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over within an area, or if Latvians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Latvians by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Indian (Asian) (65.5%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Romania (65.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Samoan (65.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Tlingit-Haida (65.5%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Taiwan (65.5%, a difference of 0.040%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
| Immigrants from Argentina | 92.4 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 92.4 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Immigrants from West Indies | 92.0 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Immigrants from Taiwan | 90.8 /100 | #139 | Exceptional 65.5% |
| Immigrants from Costa Rica | 90.8 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 65.5% |
| Samoans | 90.5 /100 | #141 | Exceptional 65.5% |
| Indians (Asian) | 89.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 65.5% |
| Latvians | 89.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 65.5% |
| Immigrants from Romania | 88.6 /100 | #144 | Excellent 65.5% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 88.3 /100 | #145 | Excellent 65.5% |
| Cypriots | 88.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 65.5% |
| Immigrants from Oceania | 87.5 /100 | #147 | Excellent 65.5% |
| Bhutanese | 86.3 /100 | #148 | Excellent 65.5% |
| Immigrants from Albania | 85.7 /100 | #149 | Excellent 65.4% |
| Immigrants | 81.9 /100 | #150 | Excellent 65.4% |
Latvian In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Latvian Data | In Labor Force | Age > 16 Data |
| Minimum | 0.030% | 28.6% |
| Maximum | 14.3% | 89.2% |
| Range | 14.3% | 60.6% |
| Mean | 3.4% | 59.3% |
| Median | 2.5% | 60.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.2% | 52.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.6% | 66.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.4% | 13.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.2% | 11.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.1% | 11.6% |
Correlation Details
| Latvian Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.030% | 161,515,841 | 65.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.100% | 37,616,099 | 66.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.17% | 10,125,212 | 66.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.25% | 4,610,996 | 66.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.32% | 2,638,204 | 66.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.39% | 1,360,177 | 63.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.47% | 604,235 | 64.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.53% | 614,493 | 63.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.60% | 467,655 | 64.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.68% | 284,731 | 64.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.75% | 192,873 | 65.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.81% | 87,279 | 65.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.89% | 122,132 | 54.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.97% | 76,776 | 68.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.03% | 107,968 | 67.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.11% | 10,507 | 56.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.18% | 31,071 | 62.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.24% | 6,472 | 66.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.33% | 21,033 | 63.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.40% | 20,393 | 68.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.48% | 11,493 | 55.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.53% | 47,136 | 61.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.61% | 10,210 | 67.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.68% | 12,516 | 66.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.75% | 4,502 | 62.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.82% | 11,282 | 58.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.88% | 9,435 | 58.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.98% | 13,973 | 59.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.03% | 4,276 | 65.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.10% | 1,807 | 59.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.19% | 20,529 | 59.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.25% | 3,992 | 50.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.35% | 8,050 | 28.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.46% | 1,745 | 59.7% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.51% | 1,392 | 55.7% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.58% | 155 | 35.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.67% | 13,497 | 59.6% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.77% | 3,575 | 42.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.94% | 2,010 | 66.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.01% | 133 | 55.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.03% | 8,425 | 71.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.09% | 162 | 47.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.17% | 441 | 46.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.23% | 402 | 63.9% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.55% | 732 | 57.9% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.70% | 811 | 49.2% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.74% | 187 | 50.3% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.87% | 1,472 | 64.4% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.03% | 2,036 | 48.4% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.09% | 220 | 51.7% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.32% | 1,343 | 60.8% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.62% | 2,143 | 72.1% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.67% | 300 | 57.4% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.88% | 41 | 86.8% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.03% | 159 | 37.7% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.56% | 126 | 56.3% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.62% | 4,611 | 59.2% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.75% | 226 | 75.6% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.83% | 223 | 70.8% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.10% | 771 | 56.5% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.46% | 449 | 47.0% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.39% | 2,313 | 35.2% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.95% | 390 | 32.1% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.51% | 94 | 42.2% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.11% | 428 | 62.9% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.41% | 442 | 89.2% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.85% | 428 | 43.4% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.10% | 84 | 85.5% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.32% | 1,990 | 48.8% |