Latvian In Labor Force | Age 35-44
COMPARE
Latvian
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Latvian In Labor Force | Age 35-44
85.4%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
24th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Latvian In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,671,100 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Latvians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.046 and weighted average of 85.4%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.16% in labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Latvians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Latvians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 within an area, or if Latvians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Latvians by In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In terms of in labor force | age 35-44, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Paraguayan (85.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Liberia (85.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Lithuania (85.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Greece (85.3%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Eastern Africa (85.4%, a difference of 0.060%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 |
| Immigrants from North Macedonia | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 85.6% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 85.6% |
| Slovenes | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 85.6% |
| Immigrants from Serbia | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 85.5% |
| Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 85.5% |
| Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 85.4% |
| Immigrants from Eastern Africa | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 85.4% |
| Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 85.4% |
| Paraguayans | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 85.4% |
| Immigrants from Liberia | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 85.4% |
| Immigrants from Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 85.4% |
| Immigrants from Greece | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 85.3% |
| Cambodians | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 85.3% |
| Bermudans | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 85.3% |
| Czechs | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 85.3% |
Latvian In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Latvian Data | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Data |
| Minimum | 0.030% | 55.4% |
| Maximum | 14.3% | 100.0% |
| Range | 14.3% | 44.6% |
| Mean | 3.0% | 87.3% |
| Median | 2.2% | 86.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.1% | 84.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.0% | 95.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.9% | 10.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.9% | 9.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.8% | 9.8% |
Correlation Details
| Latvian Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.030% | 161,503,245 | 84.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.100% | 37,616,099 | 85.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.17% | 10,108,886 | 85.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.25% | 4,610,996 | 86.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.32% | 2,638,204 | 86.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.39% | 1,355,292 | 85.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.47% | 598,377 | 87.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.53% | 614,493 | 86.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.60% | 467,655 | 86.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.68% | 282,488 | 86.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.75% | 192,873 | 86.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.81% | 87,279 | 84.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.89% | 119,240 | 84.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.97% | 76,776 | 89.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.03% | 106,595 | 85.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.11% | 10,507 | 80.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.18% | 31,071 | 87.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.24% | 6,472 | 84.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.33% | 21,033 | 85.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.40% | 20,393 | 84.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.48% | 11,493 | 63.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.53% | 47,136 | 76.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.61% | 10,210 | 93.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.68% | 12,516 | 83.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.75% | 4,502 | 84.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.82% | 11,282 | 85.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.88% | 9,435 | 82.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.98% | 13,973 | 93.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.03% | 4,276 | 99.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.10% | 1,807 | 100.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.19% | 20,529 | 84.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.26% | 3,321 | 65.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.31% | 1,861 | 64.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.46% | 1,745 | 70.7% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.51% | 1,392 | 77.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.67% | 13,497 | 89.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.77% | 3,575 | 76.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.94% | 2,010 | 95.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.03% | 8,425 | 89.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.09% | 162 | 100.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.17% | 441 | 100.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.23% | 402 | 86.5% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.55% | 732 | 95.0% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.70% | 811 | 90.7% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.74% | 187 | 100.0% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.87% | 1,472 | 84.8% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.03% | 2,036 | 100.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.09% | 220 | 78.9% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.32% | 1,343 | 93.7% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.62% | 2,143 | 84.8% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.67% | 300 | 100.0% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.03% | 159 | 100.0% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.16% | 349 | 100.0% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.62% | 4,611 | 88.8% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.83% | 223 | 100.0% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.10% | 771 | 100.0% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.46% | 449 | 97.8% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.95% | 390 | 100.0% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.51% | 94 | 100.0% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.11% | 428 | 86.1% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.85% | 428 | 81.8% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.32% | 1,990 | 55.4% |