Latvian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Latvian
Select to Compare
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Latvian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
13.5%
POVERTY | GIRLS < 16
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
27th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Latvian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 217,091,398 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.730 and weighted average of 13.5%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 6.0% in poverty level among girls under the age of 16.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Latvians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Latvians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 within an area, or if Latvians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Latvians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Eastern European (13.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Tongan (13.6%, a difference of 0.26%), Bolivian (13.6%, a difference of 0.38%), Immigrants from China (13.4%, a difference of 0.81%), and Asian (13.7%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Immigrants from Japan | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Indians (Asian) | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Immigrants from Eastern Asia | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 13.4% |
| Immigrants from China | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 13.4% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 13.5% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 13.5% |
| Tongans | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Asians | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Turks | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Danes | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 13.7% |
| Maltese | 99.7 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Latvian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Latvian Data | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Data |
| Minimum | 0.030% | 1.2% |
| Maximum | 12.9% | 100.0% |
| Range | 12.8% | 98.8% |
| Mean | 2.3% | 20.0% |
| Median | 1.5% | 14.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 0.72% | 8.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.0% | 20.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.3% | 11.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.5% | 20.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.5% | 20.6% |
Correlation Details
| Latvian Percentile | Sample Size | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.030% | 160,935,886 | 17.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.100% | 36,561,323 | 12.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.17% | 9,547,710 | 11.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.25% | 4,146,600 | 10.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.31% | 2,336,792 | 8.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.39% | 1,173,439 | 13.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.47% | 524,599 | 14.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.53% | 545,082 | 8.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.60% | 375,714 | 11.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.69% | 243,609 | 6.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.75% | 169,934 | 11.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.81% | 82,583 | 19.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.89% | 96,511 | 16.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.97% | 63,577 | 5.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.03% | 96,385 | 8.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.11% | 5,835 | 22.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.19% | 24,020 | 8.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.31% | 8,298 | 18.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.38% | 11,410 | 19.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.48% | 10,600 | 15.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.53% | 44,216 | 17.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.61% | 1,494 | 9.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.75% | 4,502 | 31.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.81% | 7,329 | 27.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.87% | 6,308 | 6.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.98% | 13,718 | 2.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.19% | 19,881 | 5.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.26% | 973 | 49.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.31% | 1,297 | 32.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.67% | 9,826 | 1.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.94% | 2,010 | 16.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.03% | 8,425 | 3.8% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.70% | 459 | 56.1% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.87% | 1,472 | 19.6% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.31% | 1,091 | 8.9% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.62% | 1,841 | 2.7% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.62% | 4,611 | 14.8% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.10% | 771 | 20.8% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.46% | 449 | 55.0% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.95% | 390 | 81.9% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.85% | 428 | 100.0% |