Latvian Receiving Food Stamps
COMPARE
Latvian
Select to Compare
Receiving Food Stamps
Latvian Receiving Food Stamps
9.1%
PUBLIC INCOME | FOOD STAMPS
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
20th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Latvian Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,272,537 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.423 and weighted average of 9.1%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.3% in percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Latvians and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Latvians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps within an area, or if Latvians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Latvians by Receiving Food Stamps
In terms of receiving food stamps, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Luxembourger (9.1%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (9.1%, a difference of 0.33%), Immigrants from Australia (9.2%, a difference of 0.40%), Eastern European (9.2%, a difference of 0.51%), and Immigrants from Northern Europe (9.2%, a difference of 0.54%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Receiving Food Stamps |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 8.9% |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 8.9% |
Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Immigrants from Japan | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Immigrants from Scotland | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Danes | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Immigrants from Hong Kong | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Immigrants from Australia | 99.8 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Immigrants from Northern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Immigrants from Ireland | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Latvian Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Summary
Measurement | Latvian Data | Receiving Food Stamps Data |
Minimum | 0.030% | 0.20% |
Maximum | 14.3% | 35.1% |
Range | 14.3% | 34.9% |
Mean | 2.7% | 9.3% |
Median | 2.1% | 7.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.0% | 4.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.7% | 11.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.7% | 7.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.4% | 7.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.4% | 7.2% |
Correlation Details
Latvian Percentile | Sample Size | Receiving Food Stamps |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.030% | 161,446,472 | 11.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.100% | 37,548,982 | 8.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.17% | 10,032,458 | 7.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.25% | 4,546,627 | 6.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.32% | 2,620,297 | 7.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.39% | 1,339,467 | 8.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.47% | 592,213 | 8.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.53% | 596,646 | 6.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.60% | 461,537 | 7.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.68% | 279,984 | 4.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.75% | 190,983 | 7.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.81% | 87,279 | 10.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.89% | 115,414 | 9.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.97% | 76,776 | 3.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.04% | 75,222 | 7.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.11% | 9,982 | 12.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.18% | 30,470 | 10.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.26% | 2,310 | 2.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.32% | 8,819 | 9.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.40% | 19,688 | 7.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.48% | 11,493 | 8.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.53% | 47,136 | 11.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.60% | 8,498 | 3.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.68% | 12,516 | 3.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.75% | 4,502 | 7.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.82% | 11,282 | 13.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.87% | 8,442 | 6.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.98% | 13,973 | 1.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.03% | 4,276 | 2.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.10% | 1,807 | 6.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.19% | 20,529 | 2.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.26% | 3,321 | 9.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.31% | 1,861 | 15.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.46% | 609 | 2.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.51% | 1,392 | 8.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.67% | 9,826 | 1.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.94% | 2,010 | 18.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.01% | 133 | 5.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.03% | 8,425 | 0.20% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.09% | 162 | 3.2% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.16% | 253 | 35.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.23% | 402 | 14.7% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.55% | 732 | 11.7% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.70% | 811 | 9.7% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.74% | 187 | 23.2% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.87% | 1,472 | 10.1% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.03% | 2,036 | 0.70% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.09% | 220 | 5.5% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.32% | 1,343 | 4.2% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.62% | 2,143 | 2.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.67% | 300 | 16.1% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.03% | 159 | 2.2% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.62% | 4,611 | 13.0% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.75% | 226 | 6.3% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.83% | 223 | 25.7% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.10% | 771 | 8.0% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.46% | 449 | 11.8% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.95% | 390 | 32.9% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.32% | 1,990 | 24.5% |