Iroquois In Labor Force | Age > 16
COMPARE
Iroquois
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Iroquois In Labor Force | Age > 16
63.2%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
312th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iroquois In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,293,305 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.479 and weighted average of 63.2%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.16% in labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Iroquois and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Iroquois influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over within an area, or if Iroquois simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Iroquois by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Blackfeet (63.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Shoshone (63.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Chippewa (63.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Scotch-Irish (63.3%, a difference of 0.14%), and Yaqui (63.0%, a difference of 0.23%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Scotch-Irish | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 63.3% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 63.2% |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 63.2% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 63.2% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 63.1% |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 63.0% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 62.8% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 62.7% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 62.4% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 62.3% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 62.1% |
Iroquois In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Iroquois Data | In Labor Force | Age > 16 Data |
| Minimum | 0.054% | 42.3% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 69.6% |
| Range | 99.9% | 27.3% |
| Mean | 17.3% | 55.7% |
| Median | 11.3% | 56.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 50.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.3% | 61.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 19.9% | 10.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 18.9% | 6.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.6% | 6.3% |
Correlation Details
| Iroquois Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.054% | 203,104,097 | 65.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.65% | 2,862,160 | 61.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.21% | 581,974 | 60.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.73% | 221,781 | 60.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.14% | 295,752 | 63.9% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.61% | 35,437 | 61.9% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.19% | 53,417 | 62.9% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.67% | 39,289 | 50.7% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.15% | 11,474 | 61.2% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.82% | 5,622 | 57.2% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.07% | 2,211 | 56.0% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.76% | 2,481 | 53.5% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.96% | 10,561 | 69.6% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.56% | 839 | 48.5% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.08% | 1,568 | 61.1% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.72% | 272 | 52.0% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.25% | 1,345 | 49.7% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.43% | 356 | 57.6% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.28% | 6,186 | 57.4% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.67% | 12,363 | 64.3% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.46% | 4,367 | 50.0% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.11% | 36 | 50.0% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.58% | 1,097 | 53.6% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.84% | 1,681 | 60.1% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.32% | 2,207 | 56.7% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.90% | 1,202 | 61.6% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.82% | 2,076 | 49.5% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.37% | 885 | 52.2% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.39% | 1,037 | 48.8% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.85% | 12,805 | 54.9% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.37% | 506 | 58.8% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.26% | 2,218 | 59.4% |
[ 24.5% - 25.0% ] 24.74% | 2,910 | 51.2% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.91% | 656 | 53.2% |
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.31% | 1,600 | 57.7% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.83% | 205 | 46.8% |
[ 27.0% - 27.5% ] 27.27% | 132 | 42.3% |
[ 28.0% - 28.5% ] 28.26% | 138 | 62.7% |
[ 30.5% - 31.0% ] 30.77% | 117 | 50.6% |
[ 38.0% - 38.5% ] 38.12% | 160 | 63.8% |
[ 43.5% - 44.0% ] 43.75% | 128 | 52.9% |
[ 53.5% - 54.0% ] 53.93% | 4,222 | 48.8% |
[ 59.5% - 60.0% ] 59.63% | 3,669 | 46.8% |
[ 99.5% - 100.0% ] 100.00% | 66 | 44.9% |