Iroquois vs Shoshone Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Iroquois
Shoshone
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Iroquois
Shoshone
25.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
315th/ 347
METRIC RANK
25.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
302nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iroquois vs Shoshone Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 205,850,666 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.580 and weighted average of 25.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,449,019 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Shoshone and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.130 and weighted average of 25.1%, a difference of 2.5%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Iroquois | Shoshone |
Minimum | 11.7% | 9.1% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 88.3% | 90.9% |
Mean | 41.3% | 39.8% |
Median | 32.1% | 30.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 23.3% | 24.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 46.9% | 50.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 23.6% | 25.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 25.2% | 23.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 24.8% | 23.4% |
Demographics Similar to Iroquois and Shoshone by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Immigrants from Somalia (25.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Cherokee (25.7%, a difference of 0.32%), Comanche (25.6%, a difference of 0.68%), Paiute (25.5%, a difference of 0.79%), and Immigrants from Honduras (25.5%, a difference of 0.84%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Shoshone are Honduran (25.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Blackfeet (25.1%, a difference of 0.26%), Mexican (25.0%, a difference of 0.34%), Somali (25.2%, a difference of 0.40%), and Immigrants from Congo (25.3%, a difference of 0.66%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 24.9% |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 25.0% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 25.1% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 25.1% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 25.1% |
Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 25.2% |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 25.3% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 25.3% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 25.3% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 25.4% |
Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 25.4% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 25.4% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 25.5% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |