Iroquois Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
COMPARE
Iroquois
Select to Compare
Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
Iroquois Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
17.5%
POVERTY | FEMALES 25-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
312th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iroquois Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 205,419,600 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.450 and weighted average of 17.5%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.63% in poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Iroquois and poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Iroquois influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 within an area, or if Iroquois simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Iroquois by Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
In terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Colville (17.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (17.6%, a difference of 0.76%), Yakama (17.6%, a difference of 0.98%), Dominican (17.6%, a difference of 0.98%), and Immigrants from Honduras (17.3%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds |
| Immigrants from Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 17.1% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 17.2% |
| Immigrants from Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 17.3% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Immigrants from Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 17.9% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 18.0% |
Iroquois Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Iroquois Data | Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Data |
| Minimum | 0.053% | 0.99% |
| Maximum | 59.6% | 83.3% |
| Range | 59.6% | 82.3% |
| Mean | 14.0% | 27.9% |
| Median | 9.5% | 21.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.9% | 14.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.1% | 34.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.2% | 19.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.8% | 20.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.6% | 20.4% |
Correlation Details
| Iroquois Percentile | Sample Size | Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.053% | 201,506,616 | 14.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.65% | 2,722,568 | 18.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.22% | 514,027 | 17.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.73% | 194,032 | 16.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.14% | 285,078 | 18.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.60% | 29,185 | 14.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.21% | 45,696 | 21.2% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.68% | 33,132 | 29.7% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.15% | 9,417 | 31.2% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.82% | 5,102 | 46.8% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.05% | 1,940 | 39.0% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.80% | 1,759 | 31.6% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.94% | 10,130 | 1.2% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.08% | 1,568 | 29.8% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.25% | 1,345 | 39.1% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.28% | 6,186 | 12.5% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.67% | 12,363 | 13.7% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.46% | 4,367 | 19.1% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.49% | 505 | 24.1% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.84% | 1,681 | 1.8% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.90% | 1,202 | 0.99% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.82% | 1,976 | 14.7% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.39% | 1,037 | 83.3% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.85% | 12,805 | 30.7% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.37% | 506 | 17.6% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.26% | 2,218 | 37.4% |
[ 24.5% - 25.0% ] 24.74% | 2,910 | 21.9% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.91% | 656 | 83.3% |
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.31% | 1,600 | 23.2% |
[ 43.5% - 44.0% ] 43.75% | 128 | 15.0% |
[ 53.5% - 54.0% ] 53.93% | 4,196 | 56.8% |
[ 59.5% - 60.0% ] 59.63% | 3,669 | 68.1% |