Iroquois In Labor Force | Age 20-64
COMPARE
Iroquois
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Iroquois In Labor Force | Age 20-64
77.5%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 20-64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
302nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iroquois In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,293,239 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.344 and weighted average of 77.5%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.29% in labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Iroquois and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Iroquois influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 within an area, or if Iroquois simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Iroquois by In Labor Force | Age 20-64
In terms of in labor force | age 20-64, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Nepalese (77.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Spanish American Indian (77.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Hispanic or Latino (77.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Dominican (77.7%, a difference of 0.22%), and Cree (77.7%, a difference of 0.22%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 20-64 |
Immigrants from Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 77.7% |
Immigrants from Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 77.7% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 77.7% |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 77.7% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 77.6% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 77.6% |
Nepalese | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 77.5% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 77.5% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 77.3% |
Immigrants from Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 77.3% |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 77.2% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 77.2% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 77.1% |
Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 77.0% |
Americans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 77.0% |
Iroquois In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Iroquois Data | In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Data |
Minimum | 0.054% | 36.8% |
Maximum | 59.6% | 100.0% |
Range | 59.6% | 63.2% |
Mean | 15.4% | 72.6% |
Median | 11.1% | 73.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.1% | 66.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.7% | 79.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 19.7% | 12.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.1% | 11.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.9% | 11.7% |
Correlation Details
Iroquois Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age 20-64 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.054% | 203,104,097 | 78.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.65% | 2,862,160 | 76.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.21% | 581,974 | 76.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.73% | 221,781 | 76.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.14% | 295,752 | 78.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.61% | 35,437 | 79.2% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.19% | 53,417 | 79.1% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.67% | 39,289 | 68.3% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.15% | 11,474 | 78.1% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.82% | 5,622 | 70.2% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.07% | 2,211 | 68.3% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.76% | 2,481 | 65.9% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.96% | 10,561 | 80.8% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.56% | 839 | 72.6% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.08% | 1,568 | 82.7% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.72% | 272 | 88.0% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.25% | 1,345 | 66.1% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.43% | 356 | 84.5% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.28% | 6,186 | 71.7% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.67% | 12,363 | 77.0% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.46% | 4,367 | 68.2% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.11% | 36 | 100.0% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.58% | 1,097 | 74.7% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.84% | 1,681 | 82.0% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.32% | 2,207 | 74.6% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.90% | 1,202 | 86.8% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.82% | 2,076 | 60.4% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.37% | 885 | 59.7% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.39% | 1,037 | 64.3% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.85% | 12,805 | 68.4% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.37% | 506 | 73.7% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.26% | 2,218 | 71.6% |
[ 24.5% - 25.0% ] 24.74% | 2,910 | 68.6% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.91% | 656 | 60.8% |
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.31% | 1,600 | 79.0% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.83% | 205 | 76.9% |
[ 27.0% - 27.5% ] 27.27% | 132 | 42.3% |
[ 28.0% - 28.5% ] 28.26% | 138 | 66.2% |
[ 30.5% - 31.0% ] 30.77% | 117 | 36.8% |
[ 38.0% - 38.5% ] 38.12% | 160 | 100.0% |
[ 43.5% - 44.0% ] 43.75% | 128 | 64.3% |
[ 53.5% - 54.0% ] 53.93% | 4,222 | 63.2% |
[ 59.5% - 60.0% ] 59.63% | 3,669 | 61.3% |