Iroquois Disability Age 65 to 74
COMPARE
Iroquois
Select to Compare
Disability Age 65 to 74
Iroquois Disability Age 65 to 74
25.4%
DISABILITY | AGE 65 TO 74
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
263rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iroquois Disability Age 65 to 74 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,066,685 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 65 and 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.583 and weighted average of 25.4%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.51% in percentage of population with a disability between the ages 65 and 75.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Iroquois and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 65 and 75 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Iroquois influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of population with a disability between the ages 65 and 75 within an area, or if Iroquois simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of population with a disability between the ages 65 and 75 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Iroquois by Disability Age 65 to 74
In terms of disability age 65 to 74, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Samoan (25.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Cape Verdean (25.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Malaysian (25.4%, a difference of 0.18%), Hawaiian (25.5%, a difference of 0.34%), and Guatemalan (25.5%, a difference of 0.39%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 65 to 74 |
| Immigrants from Somalia | 0.4 /100 | #256 | Tragic 25.2% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 0.3 /100 | #257 | Tragic 25.3% |
| Marshallese | 0.3 /100 | #258 | Tragic 25.3% |
| Immigrants from Cambodia | 0.3 /100 | #259 | Tragic 25.3% |
| Malaysians | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Samoans | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Iroquois | 0.2 /100 | #263 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Hawaiians | 0.2 /100 | #264 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Guatemalans | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Immigrants from Latin America | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 25.6% |
| Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 25.6% |
| Liberians | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 25.6% |
| Hmong | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Immigrants from Guatemala | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 25.7% |
Iroquois Disability Age 65 to 74 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Iroquois Data | Disability Age 65 to 74 Data |
| Minimum | 0.054% | 12.8% |
| Maximum | 98.3% | 100.0% |
| Range | 98.3% | 87.2% |
| Mean | 15.3% | 34.8% |
| Median | 9.7% | 31.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.8% | 25.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.9% | 37.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.0% | 12.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 18.8% | 16.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.5% | 16.2% |
Correlation Details
| Iroquois Percentile | Sample Size | Disability Age 65 to 74 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.054% | 202,921,792 | 24.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.65% | 2,826,314 | 25.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.21% | 580,755 | 25.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.73% | 219,278 | 27.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.14% | 295,400 | 25.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.60% | 33,843 | 27.7% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.19% | 52,759 | 25.2% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.67% | 39,289 | 33.7% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.15% | 11,323 | 34.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.84% | 5,334 | 31.6% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.03% | 1,711 | 32.3% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.76% | 2,481 | 48.9% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.96% | 10,561 | 12.8% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.53% | 735 | 39.8% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.11% | 1,238 | 34.1% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.72% | 272 | 58.0% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.25% | 1,345 | 32.6% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.43% | 356 | 21.8% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.28% | 6,186 | 29.2% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.67% | 12,363 | 23.2% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.46% | 4,367 | 30.0% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.11% | 36 | 50.0% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.58% | 1,097 | 37.4% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.84% | 1,681 | 38.9% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.32% | 2,207 | 17.3% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.90% | 1,202 | 26.3% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.82% | 2,076 | 31.2% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.37% | 885 | 29.3% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.39% | 1,037 | 69.0% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.85% | 12,805 | 23.6% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.37% | 506 | 29.2% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.26% | 2,218 | 18.4% |
[ 24.5% - 25.0% ] 24.74% | 2,910 | 26.1% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.91% | 656 | 72.2% |
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.31% | 1,600 | 31.1% |
[ 30.5% - 31.0% ] 30.77% | 117 | 37.2% |
[ 53.5% - 54.0% ] 53.93% | 4,222 | 37.6% |
[ 59.5% - 60.0% ] 59.63% | 3,669 | 38.1% |
[ 98.0% - 98.5% ] 98.31% | 59 | 100.0% |