Iroquois Poverty
COMPARE
Iroquois
Select to Compare
Poverty
Iroquois Poverty
14.5%
POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
267th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iroquois Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,260,268 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.624 and weighted average of 14.5%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.60% in poverty level.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Iroquois and poverty level does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Iroquois influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level within an area, or if Iroquois simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Iroquois by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Subsaharan African (14.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Cuba (14.6%, a difference of 0.19%), Guyanese (14.5%, a difference of 0.32%), Central American (14.6%, a difference of 0.33%), and Immigrants from Guyana (14.5%, a difference of 0.49%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants from Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants from Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants from Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants from Cuba | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 14.8% |
Iroquois Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Iroquois Data | Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.054% | 3.3% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 99.9% | 96.7% |
| Mean | 16.2% | 21.2% |
| Median | 10.5% | 15.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.9% | 12.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.3% | 22.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.4% | 10.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 19.1% | 18.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.8% | 18.3% |
Correlation Details
| Iroquois Percentile | Sample Size | Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.054% | 203,082,834 | 13.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.65% | 2,853,837 | 15.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.21% | 581,728 | 13.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.73% | 220,925 | 13.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.14% | 295,625 | 15.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.61% | 35,329 | 12.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.19% | 52,670 | 16.7% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.67% | 39,289 | 19.4% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.15% | 11,224 | 15.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.82% | 5,581 | 29.6% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.07% | 2,211 | 16.1% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.80% | 1,913 | 17.5% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.96% | 10,561 | 4.4% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.56% | 839 | 8.1% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.08% | 1,568 | 17.9% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.72% | 272 | 3.3% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.25% | 1,345 | 14.0% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.43% | 356 | 8.4% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.28% | 6,186 | 9.1% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.67% | 12,363 | 10.1% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.46% | 4,367 | 16.1% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.11% | 36 | 72.2% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.58% | 1,097 | 7.8% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.84% | 1,681 | 16.0% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.32% | 2,207 | 11.9% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.90% | 1,202 | 12.2% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.82% | 2,076 | 14.9% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.37% | 885 | 13.8% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.39% | 1,037 | 42.1% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.85% | 12,805 | 24.8% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.37% | 506 | 27.0% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.26% | 2,218 | 12.2% |
[ 24.5% - 25.0% ] 24.74% | 2,910 | 19.2% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.91% | 656 | 54.7% |
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.31% | 1,600 | 21.1% |
[ 27.0% - 27.5% ] 27.27% | 132 | 50.0% |
[ 28.0% - 28.5% ] 28.26% | 138 | 12.3% |
[ 43.5% - 44.0% ] 43.75% | 128 | 23.0% |
[ 53.5% - 54.0% ] 53.93% | 4,196 | 23.2% |
[ 59.5% - 60.0% ] 59.63% | 3,669 | 22.2% |
[ 99.5% - 100.0% ] 100.00% | 66 | 100.0% |