Iroquois vs Aleut Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Iroquois
Aleut
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Iroquois
Aleuts
25.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
315th/ 347
METRIC RANK
25.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
308th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iroquois vs Aleut Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 205,850,666 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.580 and weighted average of 25.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,521,342 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Aleuts and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.395 and weighted average of 25.4%, a difference of 1.3%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Iroquois | Aleut |
Minimum | 11.7% | 7.7% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 88.3% | 92.3% |
Mean | 41.3% | 37.3% |
Median | 32.1% | 29.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 23.3% | 22.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 46.9% | 45.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 23.6% | 22.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 25.2% | 23.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 24.8% | 22.8% |
Demographics Similar to Iroquois and Aleuts by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Immigrants from Somalia (25.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Cherokee (25.7%, a difference of 0.32%), Comanche (25.6%, a difference of 0.68%), Paiute (25.5%, a difference of 0.79%), and Immigrants from Honduras (25.5%, a difference of 0.84%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Aleuts are Dominican (25.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Central American Indian (25.5%, a difference of 0.16%), Potawatomi (25.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Mexico (25.3%, a difference of 0.39%), and Immigrants from Honduras (25.5%, a difference of 0.44%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 25.1% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 25.1% |
Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 25.2% |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 25.3% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 25.3% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 25.3% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 25.4% |
Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 25.4% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 25.4% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 25.5% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |