Immigrants from Vietnam Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Immigrants from Vietnam
Select to Compare
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Immigrants from Vietnam Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
15.5%
POVERTY | GIRLS < 16
88.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
138th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Vietnam Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 398,322,912 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Vietnam and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.133 and weighted average of 15.5%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Vietnam within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.090% in poverty level among girls under the age of 16.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Vietnam and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Vietnam influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 within an area, or if Immigrants from Vietnam simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Vietnam by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Vietnam are Armenian (15.5%, a difference of 0.10%), South African (15.5%, a difference of 0.13%), Native Hawaiian (15.5%, a difference of 0.22%), Czechoslovakian (15.5%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Spain (15.5%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Immigrants from Western Europe | 90.0 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Mongolians | 89.7 /100 | #132 | Excellent 15.4% |
| Brazilians | 89.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 15.4% |
| Immigrants from Spain | 89.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 15.5% |
| Czechoslovakians | 89.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 15.5% |
| Native Hawaiians | 89.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 15.5% |
| South Africans | 88.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 15.5% |
| Immigrants from Vietnam | 88.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 15.5% |
| Armenians | 87.9 /100 | #139 | Excellent 15.5% |
| New Zealanders | 87.2 /100 | #140 | Excellent 15.6% |
| Immigrants from Jordan | 87.2 /100 | #141 | Excellent 15.6% |
| Canadians | 87.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 15.6% |
| Immigrants from Peru | 86.6 /100 | #143 | Excellent 15.6% |
| Israelis | 86.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 15.6% |
| Welsh | 85.4 /100 | #145 | Excellent 15.6% |
Immigrants from Vietnam Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Vietnam Data | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Data |
| Minimum | 0.12% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 31.6% | 36.6% |
| Range | 31.4% | 35.2% |
| Mean | 10.7% | 16.3% |
| Median | 8.1% | 16.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.1% | 13.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.9% | 18.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.8% | 5.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.6% | 5.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.5% | 5.8% |
Correlation Details
| Immigrants from Vietnam Percentile | Sample Size | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.12% | 201,238,644 | 18.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.37% | 83,680,482 | 16.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.64% | 40,132,223 | 15.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.90% | 18,067,341 | 13.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.18% | 15,884,404 | 16.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.43% | 7,012,355 | 14.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.72% | 8,944,191 | 13.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.97% | 3,938,879 | 12.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.20% | 3,023,931 | 13.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.46% | 2,366,820 | 14.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.73% | 1,481,118 | 15.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.00% | 1,410,812 | 14.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.28% | 1,211,777 | 17.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.50% | 942,953 | 16.2% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.77% | 650,641 | 17.2% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.07% | 1,148,547 | 17.1% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.31% | 522,167 | 19.4% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.54% | 304,695 | 13.1% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.83% | 393,959 | 16.3% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.03% | 244,627 | 12.2% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.31% | 474,850 | 16.7% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.62% | 323,967 | 17.6% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.90% | 294,434 | 19.9% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.18% | 333,137 | 14.3% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.29% | 42,330 | 17.7% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.65% | 223,507 | 21.8% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.89% | 88,010 | 12.0% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.22% | 181,644 | 19.8% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.39% | 167,688 | 12.9% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.71% | 113,259 | 17.5% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.96% | 274,548 | 16.3% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.13% | 1,107,074 | 9.1% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.51% | 71,794 | 17.9% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.95% | 167,741 | 12.4% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.19% | 158,485 | 4.3% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.55% | 183,803 | 18.8% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.70% | 84,700 | 23.5% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.21% | 61,593 | 17.1% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.54% | 44,528 | 36.6% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.11% | 17,264 | 5.6% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.36% | 19,420 | 8.8% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.78% | 74,703 | 27.5% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.45% | 37,340 | 16.8% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.29% | 40,981 | 8.3% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.77% | 31,102 | 18.0% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.95% | 38,271 | 18.2% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.08% | 61,688 | 33.9% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.88% | 142,257 | 9.9% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.59% | 53,476 | 15.9% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.45% | 7,786 | 1.3% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.11% | 113,587 | 11.5% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.62% | 127,330 | 17.8% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.25% | 45,688 | 11.1% |
[ 19.5% - 20.0% ] 19.79% | 859 | 22.7% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.07% | 171,637 | 17.0% |
[ 24.0% - 24.5% ] 24.01% | 2,916 | 20.1% |
[ 24.5% - 25.0% ] 24.66% | 36,657 | 8.9% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.81% | 34,188 | 22.4% |
[ 28.5% - 29.0% ] 28.67% | 593 | 22.7% |
[ 28.5% - 29.0% ] 28.68% | 47,549 | 17.1% |
[ 29.0% - 29.5% ] 29.13% | 16,072 | 15.3% |
[ 30.0% - 30.5% ] 30.26% | 181,268 | 19.8% |
[ 31.5% - 32.0% ] 31.56% | 22,622 | 21.4% |