Immigrants from Vietnam Single Father Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Vietnam
Select to Compare
Single Father Poverty
Immigrants from Vietnam Single Father Poverty
14.1%
POVERTY | SINGLE FATHERS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
14th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Vietnam Single Father Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 320,936,660 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Vietnam and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.082 and weighted average of 14.1%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Vietnam within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.064% in poverty level among single fathers.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Vietnam and poverty level among single fathers does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Vietnam influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among single fathers within an area, or if Immigrants from Vietnam simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among single fathers due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Vietnam by Single Father Poverty
In terms of single father poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Vietnam are Sri Lankan (14.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Iran (14.2%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Philippines (14.0%, a difference of 0.70%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (14.2%, a difference of 0.71%), and Soviet Union (14.3%, a difference of 0.74%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Father Poverty |
Immigrants from Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Samoans | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Koreans | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Immigrants from India | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Immigrants from Philippines | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Immigrants from Vietnam | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Sri Lankans | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Immigrants from Iran | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Immigrants from Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Soviet Union | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Immigrants from Iraq | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Immigrants from Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Immigrants from Afghanistan | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Immigrants from Vietnam Single Father Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Vietnam Data | Single Father Poverty Data |
Minimum | 0.12% | 2.0% |
Maximum | 31.6% | 31.8% |
Range | 31.4% | 29.8% |
Mean | 9.5% | 15.2% |
Median | 7.4% | 13.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.6% | 11.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.5% | 18.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.9% | 6.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.8% | 6.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.8% | 6.0% |
Correlation Details
Immigrants from Vietnam Percentile | Sample Size | Single Father Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.12% | 161,913,724 | 16.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.37% | 66,949,189 | 15.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.64% | 32,784,794 | 13.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.90% | 13,376,483 | 13.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.18% | 13,169,378 | 14.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.43% | 5,503,391 | 13.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.72% | 8,013,105 | 13.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.98% | 2,961,725 | 11.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.19% | 2,566,507 | 14.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.45% | 1,788,268 | 15.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.73% | 1,075,035 | 11.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 3.00% | 1,066,874 | 12.7% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.28% | 1,117,602 | 21.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.50% | 814,048 | 12.3% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.79% | 466,448 | 23.4% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.08% | 1,064,283 | 10.9% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.31% | 440,610 | 17.2% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.53% | 273,052 | 12.6% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.83% | 264,637 | 11.9% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.02% | 167,099 | 8.6% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.32% | 438,290 | 11.9% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.62% | 294,967 | 13.3% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.90% | 294,434 | 18.0% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.19% | 286,189 | 13.6% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.29% | 42,330 | 18.6% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.65% | 217,023 | 13.1% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.89% | 88,010 | 18.8% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.22% | 144,293 | 27.0% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.39% | 81,004 | 31.8% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.74% | 63,757 | 16.2% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.98% | 213,965 | 17.2% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.13% | 1,107,074 | 5.9% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.51% | 69,794 | 21.0% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.95% | 167,741 | 6.2% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.19% | 158,485 | 11.0% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.55% | 183,803 | 20.4% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.70% | 84,700 | 24.7% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.21% | 61,593 | 10.7% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.54% | 44,528 | 26.5% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.11% | 17,264 | 23.2% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.76% | 67,787 | 24.4% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.45% | 37,340 | 17.7% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.29% | 40,981 | 16.0% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.77% | 31,102 | 11.9% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.95% | 38,271 | 9.2% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.08% | 61,688 | 18.5% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.87% | 28,749 | 4.4% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.59% | 52,555 | 8.2% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.11% | 113,587 | 12.0% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.63% | 120,767 | 11.8% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.25% | 45,688 | 21.9% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.07% | 171,637 | 12.4% |
[ 24.0% - 24.5% ] 24.01% | 2,916 | 27.3% |
[ 24.5% - 25.0% ] 24.66% | 36,657 | 2.0% |
[ 28.5% - 29.0% ] 28.68% | 47,549 | 5.9% |
[ 30.0% - 30.5% ] 30.26% | 181,268 | 15.8% |
[ 31.5% - 32.0% ] 31.56% | 22,622 | 16.0% |