Immigrants from Vietnam Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Vietnam
Select to Compare
Male Poverty
Immigrants from Vietnam Male Poverty
10.8%
POVERTY | MALES
83.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
132nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Vietnam Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 404,476,385 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Vietnam and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.489 and weighted average of 10.8%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Vietnam within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.47% in poverty level among males.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Vietnam and poverty level among males does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Vietnam influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among males within an area, or if Immigrants from Vietnam simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among males due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Vietnam by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Vietnam are Pakistani (10.8%, a difference of 0.010%), New Zealander (10.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Belarus (10.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Brazilian (10.8%, a difference of 0.060%), and Chilean (10.7%, a difference of 0.16%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants from Norway | 86.0 /100 | #125 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants from Ukraine | 84.3 /100 | #126 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 84.3 /100 | #127 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants from Western Europe | 84.2 /100 | #128 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants from Peru | 84.1 /100 | #129 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Chileans | 83.9 /100 | #130 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants from Belarus | 83.3 /100 | #131 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants from Vietnam | 83.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #133 | Excellent 10.8% |
| New Zealanders | 82.9 /100 | #134 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Brazilians | 82.7 /100 | #135 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Immigrants from Israel | 80.9 /100 | #136 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Immigrants from Switzerland | 79.2 /100 | #137 | Good 10.8% |
| Yugoslavians | 78.2 /100 | #138 | Good 10.8% |
| Immigrants from Jordan | 77.5 /100 | #139 | Good 10.8% |
Immigrants from Vietnam Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Vietnam Data | Male Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.12% | 4.0% |
| Maximum | 52.1% | 63.3% |
| Range | 52.0% | 59.4% |
| Mean | 11.8% | 12.6% |
| Median | 9.1% | 11.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.5% | 9.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.5% | 12.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.9% | 3.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.9% | 9.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.8% | 9.4% |
Correlation Details
| Immigrants from Vietnam Percentile | Sample Size | Male Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.12% | 204,194,835 | 12.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.37% | 85,211,000 | 11.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.64% | 40,675,239 | 10.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.90% | 18,444,350 | 9.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.18% | 16,095,797 | 11.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.43% | 7,154,623 | 9.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.72% | 9,063,368 | 10.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.97% | 4,000,003 | 8.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.20% | 3,071,639 | 10.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.46% | 2,400,258 | 10.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.73% | 1,509,907 | 10.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.00% | 1,426,126 | 10.2% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.28% | 1,214,558 | 11.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.50% | 949,902 | 11.0% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.77% | 665,249 | 10.1% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.07% | 1,151,932 | 11.1% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.31% | 524,011 | 13.5% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.54% | 312,258 | 9.8% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.83% | 395,626 | 11.5% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.03% | 247,215 | 8.4% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.32% | 478,983 | 11.3% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.62% | 325,873 | 11.3% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.90% | 296,768 | 11.8% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.18% | 334,722 | 10.1% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.29% | 42,330 | 10.0% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.64% | 242,629 | 13.5% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.89% | 93,231 | 9.2% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.21% | 185,946 | 11.3% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.39% | 167,688 | 12.0% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.71% | 114,943 | 11.6% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.96% | 275,428 | 11.1% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.13% | 1,107,074 | 7.7% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.51% | 71,794 | 11.8% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.70% | 805 | 17.9% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.95% | 167,741 | 9.3% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.19% | 158,485 | 5.1% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.55% | 183,803 | 12.2% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.70% | 84,771 | 13.7% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.21% | 61,939 | 11.8% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.54% | 44,528 | 17.9% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.11% | 17,461 | 4.6% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.36% | 20,132 | 4.4% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.48% | 61 | 4.8% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.78% | 74,703 | 12.7% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.45% | 37,340 | 13.0% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.22% | 1,241 | 5.2% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.29% | 40,981 | 8.5% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.77% | 31,102 | 11.2% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.95% | 38,271 | 11.0% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.08% | 61,688 | 18.7% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.88% | 142,257 | 7.4% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.59% | 53,476 | 9.3% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.45% | 7,786 | 4.0% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.11% | 113,587 | 9.2% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.48% | 92 | 43.1% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.62% | 127,330 | 13.1% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.25% | 45,688 | 5.7% |
[ 19.5% - 20.0% ] 19.75% | 1,691 | 5.5% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.07% | 171,637 | 11.6% |
[ 24.0% - 24.5% ] 24.01% | 2,916 | 6.4% |
[ 24.5% - 25.0% ] 24.66% | 36,657 | 7.5% |
[ 25.0% - 25.5% ] 25.00% | 4 | 50.0% |
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.46% | 427 | 31.0% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.81% | 34,188 | 13.5% |
[ 28.5% - 29.0% ] 28.67% | 593 | 5.0% |
[ 28.5% - 29.0% ] 28.68% | 47,549 | 13.9% |
[ 29.0% - 29.5% ] 29.13% | 16,072 | 18.0% |
[ 30.0% - 30.5% ] 30.26% | 181,268 | 14.5% |
[ 31.5% - 32.0% ] 31.56% | 22,622 | 11.9% |
[ 52.0% - 52.5% ] 52.13% | 188 | 63.3% |