Chippewa vs Swiss Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Chippewa
Swiss
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Chippewa
Swiss
26.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
323rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
24.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
198th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chippewa vs Swiss Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 213,087,028 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.298 and weighted average of 26.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 453,637,180 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Swiss and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.600 and weighted average of 21.4%, a difference of 25.5%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chippewa | Swiss |
| Minimum | 11.9% | 12.5% |
| Maximum | 87.6% | 100.0% |
| Range | 75.7% | 87.5% |
| Mean | 38.7% | 33.2% |
| Median | 35.2% | 23.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 26.1% | 19.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 47.5% | 35.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 21.4% | 16.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.5% | 25.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.4% | 25.0% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Seminole (26.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Kiowa (26.9%, a difference of 0.41%), Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 0.84%), Choctaw (27.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and Arapaho (26.4%, a difference of 1.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |
Demographics Similar to Swiss by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Swiss are Japanese (21.3%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants (21.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (21.3%, a difference of 0.23%), Irish (21.4%, a difference of 0.25%), and Nicaraguan (21.3%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Germany | 31.1 /100 | #191 | Fair 21.3% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 30.5 /100 | #192 | Fair 21.3% |
| Basques | 28.1 /100 | #193 | Fair 21.3% |
| Czechoslovakians | 27.7 /100 | #194 | Fair 21.3% |
| Nicaraguans | 27.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 21.3% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 27.1 /100 | #196 | Fair 21.3% |
| Japanese | 26.4 /100 | #197 | Fair 21.3% |
| Swiss | 24.2 /100 | #198 | Fair 21.4% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 22.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 21.4% |
| Irish | 21.4 /100 | #200 | Fair 21.4% |
| Nigerians | 20.9 /100 | #201 | Fair 21.4% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 20.7 /100 | #202 | Fair 21.4% |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 18.8 /100 | #203 | Poor 21.5% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 16.7 /100 | #204 | Poor 21.5% |
| Finns | 16.2 /100 | #205 | Poor 21.5% |