Chippewa vs Australian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Chippewa
Australian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Chippewa
Australians
26.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
323rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
88.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
143rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chippewa vs Australian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 213,087,028 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.298 and weighted average of 26.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,875,753 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.723 and weighted average of 20.3%, a difference of 31.9%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chippewa | Australian |
| Minimum | 11.9% | 8.1% |
| Maximum | 87.6% | 100.0% |
| Range | 75.7% | 91.9% |
| Mean | 38.7% | 31.8% |
| Median | 35.2% | 24.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 26.1% | 19.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 47.5% | 33.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 21.4% | 14.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.5% | 22.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.4% | 22.4% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Seminole (26.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Kiowa (26.9%, a difference of 0.41%), Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 0.84%), Choctaw (27.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and Arapaho (26.4%, a difference of 1.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |
Demographics Similar to Australians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Immigrants from Uzbekistan (20.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Uganda (20.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from North America (20.3%, a difference of 0.19%), Syrian (20.3%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Kuwait (20.3%, a difference of 0.35%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Canada | 91.2 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 90.6 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Slovenes | 90.5 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 90.4 /100 | #139 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Syrians | 90.4 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Immigrants | North America | 89.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 89.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Australians | 88.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 88.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Austrians | 85.8 /100 | #145 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Venezuelans | 85.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 20.4% |
| South Africans | 85.3 /100 | #147 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Luxembourgers | 84.9 /100 | #148 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Portuguese | 81.5 /100 | #149 | Excellent 20.5% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 80.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 20.5% |