Chippewa Single Father Poverty
COMPARE
Chippewa
Select to Compare
Single Father Poverty
Chippewa Single Father Poverty
18.8%
POVERTY | SINGLE FATHERS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
310th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chippewa Single Father Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 183,159,389 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.302 and weighted average of 18.8%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.23% in poverty level among single fathers.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Chippewa and poverty level among single fathers does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Chippewa influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among single fathers within an area, or if Chippewa simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among single fathers due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Single Father Poverty
In terms of single father poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Nonimmigrants (18.8%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Dominica (18.9%, a difference of 0.24%), Potawatomi (18.9%, a difference of 0.44%), Delaware (18.9%, a difference of 0.61%), and Chickasaw (19.0%, a difference of 0.76%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Father Poverty |
Celtics | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 18.5% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 18.5% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 18.5% |
Scotch-Irish | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 18.6% |
French Canadians | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 18.6% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 18.6% |
Immigrants from Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 18.6% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 18.8% |
Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 18.8% |
Immigrants from Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 18.9% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 18.9% |
Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 18.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 19.0% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 19.0% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 19.1% |
Chippewa Single Father Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chippewa Data | Single Father Poverty Data |
Minimum | 0.059% | 2.1% |
Maximum | 98.2% | 100.0% |
Range | 98.1% | 97.9% |
Mean | 36.9% | 33.0% |
Median | 21.6% | 24.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.2% | 15.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 66.7% | 40.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 58.5% | 25.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 32.7% | 24.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 32.4% | 24.2% |
Correlation Details
Chippewa Percentile | Sample Size | Single Father Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.059% | 176,253,565 | 15.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.69% | 4,319,080 | 16.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.14% | 1,257,776 | 15.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.76% | 289,288 | 24.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.22% | 283,444 | 17.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.62% | 243,714 | 10.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.26% | 85,742 | 18.4% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.77% | 47,296 | 19.5% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.38% | 65,393 | 29.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.60% | 20,037 | 29.1% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.16% | 12,744 | 38.4% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.73% | 11,769 | 31.2% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.28% | 1,353 | 53.6% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.77% | 4,492 | 53.2% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.33% | 12,708 | 42.5% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.98% | 14,432 | 33.3% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.42% | 653 | 70.1% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.36% | 37,669 | 12.5% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.21% | 9,232 | 17.7% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.63% | 34,071 | 24.2% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.50% | 15,441 | 14.8% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.83% | 1,048 | 12.4% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.76% | 4,482 | 21.9% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.20% | 4,938 | 2.1% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.65% | 16,808 | 20.0% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.13% | 1,976 | 71.5% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.62% | 19,926 | 15.6% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.76% | 16,587 | 17.8% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.13% | 2,020 | 15.4% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.08% | 4,309 | 40.6% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.73% | 3,358 | 24.6% |
[ 19.5% - 20.0% ] 19.72% | 3,798 | 30.1% |
[ 23.5% - 24.0% ] 23.56% | 3,290 | 40.6% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.93% | 3,628 | 16.9% |
[ 27.5% - 28.0% ] 27.92% | 4,499 | 31.2% |
[ 34.0% - 34.5% ] 34.48% | 406 | 25.0% |
[ 37.0% - 37.5% ] 37.44% | 6,234 | 40.0% |
[ 42.5% - 43.0% ] 42.90% | 1,275 | 13.3% |
[ 44.5% - 45.0% ] 44.98% | 3,079 | 45.9% |
[ 45.0% - 45.5% ] 45.03% | 382 | 100.0% |
[ 45.5% - 46.0% ] 45.68% | 1,819 | 8.0% |
[ 47.5% - 48.0% ] 47.82% | 1,838 | 29.8% |
[ 48.5% - 49.0% ] 48.84% | 6,540 | 14.0% |
[ 51.5% - 52.0% ] 51.53% | 1,011 | 14.3% |
[ 52.5% - 53.0% ] 52.88% | 2,969 | 64.1% |
[ 63.5% - 64.0% ] 63.74% | 626 | 60.0% |
[ 65.5% - 66.0% ] 65.71% | 525 | 22.2% |
[ 66.0% - 66.5% ] 66.47% | 683 | 5.3% |
[ 66.5% - 67.0% ] 66.98% | 733 | 5.3% |
[ 70.5% - 71.0% ] 70.82% | 2,940 | 18.2% |
[ 73.5% - 74.0% ] 73.74% | 613 | 20.8% |
[ 74.0% - 74.5% ] 74.43% | 219 | 100.0% |
[ 77.0% - 77.5% ] 77.29% | 1,026 | 40.0% |
[ 77.5% - 78.0% ] 77.56% | 2,117 | 70.2% |
[ 80.0% - 80.5% ] 80.22% | 91 | 100.0% |
[ 81.5% - 82.0% ] 81.78% | 472 | 9.5% |
[ 86.5% - 87.0% ] 86.67% | 285 | 66.7% |
[ 90.0% - 90.5% ] 90.28% | 792 | 34.8% |
[ 91.0% - 91.5% ] 91.13% | 203 | 100.0% |
[ 92.5% - 93.0% ] 92.99% | 5,920 | 13.1% |
[ 94.0% - 94.5% ] 94.16% | 2,960 | 25.0% |
[ 95.5% - 96.0% ] 95.75% | 1,011 | 41.9% |
[ 97.0% - 97.5% ] 97.42% | 852 | 39.4% |
[ 98.0% - 98.5% ] 98.17% | 1,202 | 39.4% |