Chippewa vs Kiowa Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Chippewa
Kiowa
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Chippewa
Kiowa
26.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
323rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
26.9%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
324th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chippewa vs Kiowa Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 213,087,028 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.298 and weighted average of 26.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,984,677 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Kiowa and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.037 and weighted average of 26.9%, a difference of 0.41%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chippewa | Kiowa |
Minimum | 11.9% | 20.0% |
Maximum | 87.6% | 69.2% |
Range | 75.7% | 49.2% |
Mean | 38.7% | 34.9% |
Median | 35.2% | 31.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 26.1% | 25.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 47.5% | 41.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 21.4% | 16.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.5% | 12.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.4% | 12.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa and Kiowa by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Seminole (26.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 0.84%), Choctaw (27.2%, a difference of 1.4%), Arapaho (26.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and Black/African American (26.4%, a difference of 1.8%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Kiowa are Seminole (26.8%, a difference of 0.52%), Choctaw (27.2%, a difference of 0.98%), Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 1.3%), Creek (27.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and Arapaho (26.4%, a difference of 1.9%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 28.2% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 28.3% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 28.4% |