Immigrants from Guyana vs Guamanian/Chamorro Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 105,125,289 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Guamanians/Chamorros within Immigrant from Guyana communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.184. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Guyana within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Guamanians/Chamorros. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Guyana corresponds to a decrease of 1.7 Guamanians/Chamorros.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (18.4% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 41.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,186 compared to $101,170, a difference of 12.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,495 compared to $63,187, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($45,204 compared to $45,933, a difference of 1.6%), per capita income ($40,742 compared to $41,678, a difference of 2.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($55,726 compared to $53,423, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (16.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 44.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 39.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 38.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.8% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 1.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.3% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and single female poverty (21.0% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (25.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 42.0%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (13.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 34.3%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (15.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 33.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (27.3% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 40.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.3% compared to 76.7%, a difference of 10.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.0% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.5% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.6% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.29%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.8% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 21.7%), married-couple households (41.6% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 15.7%), and single mother households (7.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.5% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 1.7%), average family size (3.40 compared to 3.29, a difference of 3.4%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (29.5% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 269.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 137.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 106.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (70.6% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 30.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (35.0% compared to 60.5%, a difference of 72.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 106.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 45.1%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 20.8%), and college, under 1 year (58.5% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 1.0%), kindergarten (96.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.3% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 40.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 30.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 1.9%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 3.6%).