Immigrants from Guyana vs Immigrants from Canada Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 171,392,465 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Canada within Immigrant from Guyana communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.223. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Guyana within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.013% in Immigrants from Canada. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Guyana corresponds to a decrease of 13.0 Immigrants from Canada.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (18.4% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 55.1%), median family income ($92,513 compared to $112,374, a difference of 21.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,186 compared to $109,402, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,773 compared to $41,373, a difference of 1.5%), householder income under 25 years ($55,726 compared to $53,411, a difference of 4.3%), and median earnings ($45,204 compared to $50,192, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (16.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 74.0%), married-couple family poverty (6.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 49.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.5% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 47.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 0.31%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.3% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 0.64%), and single male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (25.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 52.5%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (15.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 42.2%), and male unemployment (7.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 41.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 3.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (27.3% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 42.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.3% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 9.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.0% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 0.41%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.6% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.66%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.8% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 35.4%), married-couple households (41.6% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 16.6%), and currently married (41.9% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.3% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 0.78%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and family households (65.5% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (29.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 237.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 92.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 79.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (70.6% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 29.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (35.0% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 64.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 79.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 90.7%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 69.0%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 45.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (96.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guyana and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.3% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 49.5%), disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 38.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.23%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.70%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 2.6%).