Portuguese vs Immigrants from Hungary Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Portuguese
Immigrants from Hungary
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Portuguese
Immigrants from Hungary
20.5%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
81.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
149th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
92.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
130th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Portuguese vs Immigrants from Hungary Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 440,230,754 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Portuguese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.212 and weighted average of 20.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 193,674,304 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hungary and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.600 and weighted average of 20.2%, a difference of 1.6%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Portuguese | Immigrants from Hungary |
| Minimum | 1.2% | 11.9% |
| Maximum | 50.5% | 100.0% |
| Range | 49.2% | 88.1% |
| Mean | 23.2% | 31.2% |
| Median | 22.0% | 23.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.8% | 19.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 27.5% | 36.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.7% | 16.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.4% | 20.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.3% | 20.3% |
Demographics Similar to Portuguese and Immigrants from Hungary by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Portuguese are Luxembourger (20.4%, a difference of 0.39%), South African (20.4%, a difference of 0.44%), Venezuelan (20.4%, a difference of 0.47%), Austrian (20.4%, a difference of 0.50%), and Immigrants from Uzbekistan (20.3%, a difference of 0.87%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hungary are Immigrants from Morocco (20.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Pakistani (20.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Uruguayan (20.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from England (20.2%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Venezuela (20.2%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 92.4 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 92.3 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Pakistanis | 92.1 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Uruguayans | 92.1 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | England | 91.9 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 91.5 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 91.2 /100 | #135 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 91.2 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 90.6 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Slovenes | 90.5 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 90.4 /100 | #139 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Syrians | 90.4 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Immigrants | North America | 89.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 89.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Australians | 88.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 88.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Austrians | 85.8 /100 | #145 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Venezuelans | 85.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 20.4% |
| South Africans | 85.3 /100 | #147 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Luxembourgers | 84.9 /100 | #148 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Portuguese | 81.5 /100 | #149 | Excellent 20.5% |