Portuguese Single Father Poverty
COMPARE
Portuguese
Select to Compare
Single Father Poverty
Portuguese Single Father Poverty
16.2%
POVERTY | SINGLE FATHERS
62.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
158th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Portuguese Single Father Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 344,973,459 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Portuguese and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.086 and weighted average of 16.2%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Portuguese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.092% in poverty level among single fathers.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Portuguese and poverty level among single fathers does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Portuguese influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among single fathers within an area, or if Portuguese simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among single fathers due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Portuguese by Single Father Poverty
In terms of single father poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Portuguese are Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (16.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Belizean (16.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Sudan (16.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Jordan (16.2%, a difference of 0.18%), and Estonian (16.2%, a difference of 0.26%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Father Poverty |
| Immigrants from France | 73.1 /100 | #151 | Good 16.1% |
| Immigrants from Zimbabwe | 72.1 /100 | #152 | Good 16.1% |
| Immigrants from Israel | 72.0 /100 | #153 | Good 16.1% |
| Mexicans | 70.1 /100 | #154 | Good 16.1% |
| Immigrants from Nicaragua | 67.8 /100 | #155 | Good 16.2% |
| Immigrants from Jordan | 66.0 /100 | #156 | Good 16.2% |
| Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | 62.8 /100 | #157 | Good 16.2% |
| Portuguese | 62.3 /100 | #158 | Good 16.2% |
| Belizeans | 59.9 /100 | #159 | Average 16.2% |
| Immigrants from Sudan | 59.8 /100 | #160 | Average 16.2% |
| Estonians | 56.7 /100 | #161 | Average 16.2% |
| Ugandans | 55.9 /100 | #162 | Average 16.3% |
| Immigrants from Costa Rica | 55.7 /100 | #163 | Average 16.3% |
| Guyanese | 55.2 /100 | #164 | Average 16.3% |
| Immigrants from Bangladesh | 55.1 /100 | #165 | Average 16.3% |
Portuguese Single Father Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Portuguese Data | Single Father Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.18% | 5.2% |
| Maximum | 43.5% | 69.3% |
| Range | 43.3% | 64.1% |
| Mean | 15.2% | 20.6% |
| Median | 11.7% | 16.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.7% | 11.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.8% | 27.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.1% | 15.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.9% | 12.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.8% | 12.6% |
Correlation Details
| Portuguese Percentile | Sample Size | Single Father Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.18% | 277,413,310 | 16.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.69% | 35,582,916 | 16.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.20% | 13,476,707 | 16.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.72% | 7,178,709 | 15.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.22% | 3,569,523 | 14.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.72% | 1,764,572 | 15.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.24% | 1,518,927 | 11.3% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.71% | 798,427 | 19.3% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.23% | 298,091 | 20.4% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.78% | 456,338 | 21.0% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.23% | 315,590 | 17.7% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.75% | 385,428 | 12.1% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.24% | 258,424 | 17.2% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.83% | 310,502 | 17.8% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.21% | 168,929 | 14.6% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.83% | 269,858 | 11.1% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.18% | 63,412 | 31.8% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.86% | 97,259 | 31.8% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.17% | 117,638 | 27.1% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.52% | 19,131 | 16.9% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.34% | 4,128 | 69.3% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.87% | 31,665 | 42.9% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.22% | 42,464 | 15.6% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.71% | 116,790 | 12.3% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.38% | 8,226 | 35.1% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.86% | 28,863 | 5.2% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.85% | 17,287 | 39.3% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.18% | 1,629 | 36.0% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.54% | 2,290 | 37.7% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.19% | 8,855 | 31.6% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.68% | 3,627 | 26.2% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.06% | 16,415 | 8.7% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.73% | 81,856 | 13.7% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.35% | 51,915 | 7.6% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.48% | 20,883 | 25.6% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.83% | 47,012 | 11.5% |
[ 24.5% - 25.0% ] 24.56% | 16,286 | 25.8% |
[ 28.5% - 29.0% ] 28.96% | 46,623 | 7.3% |
[ 29.0% - 29.5% ] 29.14% | 21,742 | 6.1% |
[ 31.5% - 32.0% ] 31.65% | 18,445 | 28.1% |
[ 32.5% - 33.0% ] 32.57% | 100,620 | 10.9% |
[ 33.5% - 34.0% ] 33.98% | 12,465 | 6.5% |
[ 35.0% - 35.5% ] 35.22% | 17,164 | 47.9% |
[ 36.0% - 36.5% ] 36.09% | 93,638 | 23.3% |
[ 37.0% - 37.5% ] 37.20% | 43,238 | 14.2% |
[ 37.5% - 38.0% ] 37.83% | 30,558 | 9.8% |
[ 43.0% - 43.5% ] 43.45% | 25,084 | 8.3% |