Portuguese Male Poverty
COMPARE
Portuguese
Select to Compare
Male Poverty
Portuguese Male Poverty
10.6%
POVERTY | MALES
91.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
108th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Portuguese Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 449,699,764 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Portuguese and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.156 and weighted average of 10.6%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Portuguese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.067% in poverty level among males.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Portuguese and poverty level among males does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Portuguese influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among males within an area, or if Portuguese simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among males due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Portuguese by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Portuguese are Laotian (10.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (10.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Albanian (10.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Canadian (10.5%, a difference of 0.20%), and Welsh (10.5%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants from Zimbabwe | 92.0 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| French Canadians | 91.9 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Slavs | 91.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Canadians | 91.6 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants from Southern Europe | 91.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Laotians | 91.2 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Portuguese | 91.0 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Albanians | 90.6 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Argentineans | 90.1 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Immigrants from Argentina | 89.8 /100 | #111 | Excellent 10.6% |
| Immigrants from Turkey | 89.5 /100 | #112 | Excellent 10.6% |
| Palestinians | 89.1 /100 | #113 | Excellent 10.6% |
| Immigrants from Brazil | 89.0 /100 | #114 | Excellent 10.6% |
| Immigrants from Russia | 88.6 /100 | #115 | Excellent 10.6% |
Portuguese Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Portuguese Data | Male Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.18% | 1.5% |
| Maximum | 51.2% | 31.5% |
| Range | 51.0% | 30.0% |
| Mean | 20.3% | 10.9% |
| Median | 18.7% | 9.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.0% | 7.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 31.5% | 12.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 22.5% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.3% | 5.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.2% | 5.7% |
Correlation Details
| Portuguese Percentile | Sample Size | Male Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.18% | 348,002,657 | 12.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.70% | 53,562,316 | 9.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.20% | 19,711,607 | 9.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.72% | 10,079,242 | 9.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.22% | 5,448,690 | 8.6% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.74% | 2,793,663 | 10.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.25% | 2,434,614 | 8.5% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.73% | 1,390,071 | 9.2% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.21% | 713,833 | 8.3% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.74% | 844,655 | 10.1% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.22% | 670,697 | 11.5% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.74% | 749,452 | 8.6% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.20% | 423,095 | 8.8% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.78% | 391,520 | 12.2% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.22% | 254,439 | 9.5% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.81% | 362,698 | 7.5% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.19% | 119,722 | 9.1% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.83% | 139,873 | 10.1% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.16% | 139,512 | 12.3% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.75% | 138,705 | 9.0% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.30% | 15,380 | 6.6% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.80% | 60,907 | 7.3% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.22% | 72,840 | 8.9% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.70% | 125,255 | 11.9% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.32% | 19,097 | 16.3% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.85% | 32,982 | 6.5% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.44% | 18,931 | 7.2% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.77% | 25,361 | 6.6% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.37% | 6,401 | 7.7% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.57% | 2,868 | 10.9% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.33% | 7,419 | 25.8% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.81% | 6,080 | 15.4% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.19% | 9,009 | 6.1% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.74% | 19,638 | 9.1% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.31% | 104 | 19.0% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.26% | 40,467 | 7.7% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.73% | 82,595 | 11.0% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.35% | 54,661 | 12.5% |
[ 19.5% - 20.0% ] 19.61% | 4,334 | 7.1% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.04% | 6,511 | 1.9% |
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.72% | 1,699 | 9.6% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.48% | 20,883 | 11.0% |
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.36% | 13,232 | 4.5% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.84% | 52,833 | 10.8% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.06% | 360 | 1.5% |
[ 24.0% - 24.5% ] 24.10% | 249 | 27.4% |
[ 24.5% - 25.0% ] 24.56% | 16,286 | 31.5% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.54% | 1,155 | 14.1% |
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.17% | 10,792 | 6.9% |
[ 27.0% - 27.5% ] 27.22% | 6,768 | 1.6% |
[ 28.0% - 28.5% ] 28.50% | 11,117 | 9.6% |
[ 28.5% - 29.0% ] 28.88% | 63,645 | 14.5% |
[ 29.0% - 29.5% ] 29.14% | 21,742 | 14.6% |
[ 30.5% - 31.0% ] 30.91% | 495 | 12.8% |
[ 31.0% - 31.5% ] 31.35% | 50,396 | 5.0% |
[ 31.5% - 32.0% ] 31.65% | 18,810 | 19.0% |
[ 32.0% - 32.5% ] 32.30% | 10,466 | 6.4% |
[ 32.5% - 33.0% ] 32.62% | 120,137 | 14.6% |
[ 33.0% - 33.5% ] 33.21% | 8,763 | 15.8% |
[ 33.5% - 34.0% ] 33.89% | 15,718 | 10.7% |
[ 34.5% - 35.0% ] 34.52% | 8,403 | 4.3% |
[ 35.0% - 35.5% ] 35.22% | 17,164 | 24.1% |
[ 36.0% - 36.5% ] 36.09% | 93,638 | 17.9% |
[ 37.0% - 37.5% ] 37.20% | 43,238 | 13.1% |
[ 37.5% - 38.0% ] 37.83% | 30,558 | 14.6% |
[ 38.0% - 38.5% ] 38.05% | 21,383 | 5.1% |
[ 38.5% - 39.0% ] 38.59% | 4,556 | 7.9% |
[ 39.0% - 39.5% ] 39.14% | 6,484 | 21.6% |
[ 41.0% - 41.5% ] 41.44% | 11,431 | 4.6% |
[ 43.0% - 43.5% ] 43.45% | 25,084 | 8.3% |
[ 48.0% - 48.5% ] 48.18% | 4,660 | 7.3% |
[ 48.5% - 49.0% ] 48.56% | 5,591 | 6.7% |
[ 51.0% - 51.5% ] 51.18% | 127 | 20.5% |