Portuguese Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Portuguese
Select to Compare
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Portuguese Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
15.6%
POVERTY | GIRLS < 16
80.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
119th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Portuguese Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 433,626,811 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Portuguese and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.097 and weighted average of 15.6%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Portuguese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.056% in poverty level among girls under the age of 16.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Portuguese and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Portuguese influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 within an area, or if Portuguese simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Portuguese by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Portuguese are New Zealander (15.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Samoan (15.7%, a difference of 0.20%), English (15.6%, a difference of 0.22%), Israeli (15.7%, a difference of 0.24%), and Irish (15.7%, a difference of 0.28%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Immigrants from Croatia | 80.7 /100 | #112 | Excellent 15.5% |
| Dutch | 80.7 /100 | #113 | Excellent 15.5% |
| Immigrants from South Africa | 80.4 /100 | #114 | Excellent 15.5% |
| Immigrants from Spain | 80.4 /100 | #115 | Excellent 15.5% |
| Jordanians | 80.3 /100 | #116 | Excellent 15.6% |
| English | 80.1 /100 | #117 | Excellent 15.6% |
| New Zealanders | 80.0 /100 | #118 | Excellent 15.6% |
| Portuguese | 80.0 /100 | #119 | Good 15.6% |
| Samoans | 79.8 /100 | #120 | Good 15.7% |
| Israelis | 79.8 /100 | #121 | Good 15.7% |
| Irish | 79.8 /100 | #122 | Good 15.7% |
| Albanians | 79.7 /100 | #123 | Good 15.7% |
| Malaysians | 79.7 /100 | #124 | Good 15.7% |
| Brazilians | 79.6 /100 | #125 | Good 15.7% |
| Scottish | 79.6 /100 | #126 | Good 15.7% |
Portuguese Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Portuguese Data | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Data |
| Minimum | 0.18% | 1.2% |
| Maximum | 46.2% | 43.9% |
| Range | 46.0% | 42.7% |
| Mean | 19.1% | 15.2% |
| Median | 15.6% | 14.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.8% | 10.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 31.2% | 18.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 23.4% | 8.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.5% | 7.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.3% | 7.7% |
Correlation Details
| Portuguese Percentile | Sample Size | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.18% | 337,868,769 | 18.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.69% | 48,958,419 | 14.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.21% | 20,264,944 | 13.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.72% | 8,733,355 | 13.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.20% | 5,660,374 | 12.9% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.73% | 2,127,050 | 12.7% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.24% | 2,067,729 | 15.6% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.77% | 1,697,411 | 12.8% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.22% | 1,042,823 | 11.9% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.70% | 649,173 | 13.4% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.25% | 531,521 | 18.6% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.69% | 519,794 | 15.0% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.20% | 658,284 | 17.3% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.72% | 417,253 | 15.8% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.30% | 291,668 | 18.0% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.77% | 294,512 | 17.3% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.23% | 162,064 | 11.5% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.79% | 195,765 | 12.8% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.13% | 114,031 | 18.4% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.87% | 49,595 | 15.5% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.29% | 123,306 | 10.5% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.78% | 95,752 | 13.4% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.18% | 47,187 | 17.9% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.77% | 11,375 | 6.4% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.23% | 14,507 | 43.9% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.63% | 27,685 | 9.6% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.35% | 18,357 | 15.7% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.71% | 98,126 | 22.2% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.15% | 22,745 | 17.3% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.63% | 8,060 | 16.0% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.39% | 3,456 | 17.9% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.74% | 1,912 | 34.4% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.88% | 9,293 | 7.6% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.26% | 3,533 | 13.9% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.82% | 74,988 | 17.6% |
[ 19.5% - 20.0% ] 19.66% | 59,591 | 24.2% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.38% | 12,434 | 10.9% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.95% | 21,050 | 5.7% |
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.20% | 11,107 | 7.0% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.83% | 692 | 6.8% |
[ 24.0% - 24.5% ] 24.19% | 63,846 | 17.9% |
[ 24.5% - 25.0% ] 24.60% | 9,097 | 10.0% |
[ 27.0% - 27.5% ] 27.13% | 45,990 | 23.1% |
[ 28.0% - 28.5% ] 28.33% | 11,166 | 7.6% |
[ 28.5% - 29.0% ] 28.75% | 8,639 | 25.8% |
[ 29.0% - 29.5% ] 29.34% | 16,287 | 6.0% |
[ 31.0% - 31.5% ] 31.21% | 37,877 | 13.2% |
[ 31.5% - 32.0% ] 31.55% | 146,975 | 20.5% |
[ 33.0% - 33.5% ] 33.16% | 6,360 | 31.6% |
[ 33.5% - 34.0% ] 33.86% | 22,011 | 27.8% |
[ 34.0% - 34.5% ] 34.37% | 2,604 | 7.9% |
[ 35.5% - 36.0% ] 35.69% | 32,814 | 22.4% |
[ 36.5% - 37.0% ] 36.63% | 39,892 | 5.3% |
[ 37.0% - 37.5% ] 37.07% | 93,339 | 24.3% |
[ 37.5% - 38.0% ] 37.55% | 10,443 | 5.2% |
[ 38.0% - 38.5% ] 38.37% | 26,981 | 19.3% |
[ 38.5% - 39.0% ] 38.75% | 31,210 | 18.5% |
[ 39.0% - 39.5% ] 39.19% | 11,496 | 1.2% |
[ 42.0% - 42.5% ] 42.20% | 4,846 | 7.6% |
[ 44.0% - 44.5% ] 44.10% | 24,884 | 22.4% |
[ 45.5% - 46.0% ] 45.89% | 4,835 | 6.1% |
[ 46.0% - 46.5% ] 46.16% | 5,529 | 2.2% |