Portuguese Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
COMPARE
Portuguese
Select to Compare
Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
Portuguese Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
16.5%
POVERTY | CHILDREN < 5
83.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
142nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Portuguese Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 426,968,187 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Portuguese and poverty level among children under the age of 5 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.348 and weighted average of 16.5%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Portuguese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.25% in poverty level among children under the age of 5.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Portuguese and poverty level among children under the age of 5 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Portuguese influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among children under the age of 5 within an area, or if Portuguese simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among children under the age of 5 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Portuguese by Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
In terms of child poverty under the age of 5, the demographic groups most similar to Portuguese are Samoan (16.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Western Europe (16.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Ethiopian (16.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (16.6%, a difference of 0.18%), and Israeli (16.6%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 |
| Brazilians | 87.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 16.4% |
| Immigrants from Northern Africa | 87.5 /100 | #136 | Excellent 16.4% |
| Immigrants from Chile | 85.3 /100 | #137 | Excellent 16.4% |
| Germans | 84.8 /100 | #138 | Excellent 16.5% |
| Immigrants from Hungary | 84.5 /100 | #139 | Excellent 16.5% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 84.2 /100 | #140 | Excellent 16.5% |
| Immigrants from Western Europe | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 16.5% |
| Portuguese | 83.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 16.5% |
| Samoans | 83.0 /100 | #143 | Excellent 16.5% |
| Ethiopians | 82.7 /100 | #144 | Excellent 16.5% |
| Immigrants from Ethiopia | 82.1 /100 | #145 | Excellent 16.6% |
| Israelis | 82.0 /100 | #146 | Excellent 16.6% |
| Immigrants from Nepal | 80.3 /100 | #147 | Excellent 16.6% |
| Syrians | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 16.6% |
| New Zealanders | 78.7 /100 | #149 | Good 16.6% |
Portuguese Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Portuguese Data | Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Data |
| Minimum | 0.18% | 5.1% |
| Maximum | 48.2% | 44.7% |
| Range | 48.0% | 39.6% |
| Mean | 17.9% | 19.2% |
| Median | 14.5% | 17.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.0% | 13.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 30.2% | 23.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 23.2% | 10.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.1% | 9.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.0% | 9.4% |
Correlation Details
| Portuguese Percentile | Sample Size | Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.18% | 335,443,679 | 18.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.70% | 48,841,133 | 14.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.20% | 17,687,473 | 14.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.72% | 8,896,119 | 13.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.22% | 4,804,855 | 13.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.74% | 2,487,689 | 18.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.25% | 2,082,648 | 13.4% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.72% | 1,236,684 | 13.6% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.21% | 568,255 | 17.5% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.75% | 775,013 | 15.1% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.21% | 574,721 | 16.2% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.74% | 665,010 | 14.3% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.21% | 384,029 | 12.2% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.79% | 360,820 | 19.7% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.21% | 237,579 | 16.4% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.81% | 350,554 | 14.1% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.19% | 106,444 | 17.6% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.86% | 111,904 | 22.3% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.16% | 137,272 | 17.8% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.74% | 122,656 | 12.6% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.37% | 9,286 | 16.2% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.82% | 49,622 | 10.9% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.27% | 35,257 | 13.7% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.70% | 123,062 | 23.1% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.39% | 7,238 | 20.4% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.86% | 28,863 | 23.0% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.46% | 18,171 | 6.9% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.83% | 19,568 | 21.9% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.48% | 525 | 41.7% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.57% | 2,821 | 19.0% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.85% | 4,598 | 26.7% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.19% | 8,855 | 9.1% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.68% | 3,627 | 24.8% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.28% | 37,822 | 5.4% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.73% | 82,595 | 12.3% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.35% | 53,635 | 18.2% |
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.70% | 1,348 | 33.4% |
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.36% | 13,232 | 6.0% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.83% | 47,319 | 12.4% |
[ 24.5% - 25.0% ] 24.56% | 16,286 | 44.7% |
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.13% | 8,101 | 5.1% |
[ 28.5% - 29.0% ] 28.88% | 62,947 | 17.5% |
[ 29.0% - 29.5% ] 29.14% | 21,742 | 23.2% |
[ 31.0% - 31.5% ] 31.35% | 50,072 | 9.1% |
[ 31.5% - 32.0% ] 31.65% | 18,445 | 26.8% |
[ 32.5% - 33.0% ] 32.57% | 100,620 | 26.9% |
[ 33.0% - 33.5% ] 33.21% | 8,763 | 39.1% |
[ 33.5% - 34.0% ] 33.98% | 12,465 | 12.6% |
[ 35.0% - 35.5% ] 35.22% | 17,164 | 40.8% |
[ 36.0% - 36.5% ] 36.09% | 93,638 | 28.3% |
[ 37.0% - 37.5% ] 37.20% | 43,238 | 14.7% |
[ 37.5% - 38.0% ] 37.83% | 30,558 | 33.8% |
[ 38.0% - 38.5% ] 38.05% | 21,383 | 5.6% |
[ 38.5% - 39.0% ] 38.59% | 4,556 | 18.2% |
[ 39.0% - 39.5% ] 39.14% | 6,484 | 40.8% |
[ 43.0% - 43.5% ] 43.45% | 25,084 | 26.5% |
[ 48.0% - 48.5% ] 48.18% | 4,660 | 21.5% |