Portuguese Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
Portuguese
Select to Compare
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Portuguese Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
15.1%
POVERTY | CHILDREN < 16
90.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
126th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Portuguese Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 444,338,613 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Portuguese and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.124 and weighted average of 15.1%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Portuguese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.084% in poverty level among children under the age of 16.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Portuguese and poverty level among children under the age of 16 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Portuguese influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among children under the age of 16 within an area, or if Portuguese simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among children under the age of 16 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Portuguese by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Portuguese are Immigrants from Western Europe (15.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Palestinian (15.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (15.1%, a difference of 0.15%), Czechoslovakian (15.1%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Brazil (15.1%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
| Scottish | 92.3 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| South Africans | 92.1 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Immigrants from Zimbabwe | 92.1 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Pakistanis | 91.7 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Immigrants from Brazil | 91.1 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Czechoslovakians | 91.0 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Palestinians | 90.9 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Portuguese | 90.6 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Immigrants from Western Europe | 90.3 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Immigrants from Kazakhstan | 90.2 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Immigrants from Southern Europe | 89.7 /100 | #129 | Excellent 15.1% |
| Mongolians | 89.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 15.2% |
| Armenians | 89.4 /100 | #131 | Excellent 15.2% |
| Canadians | 89.1 /100 | #132 | Excellent 15.2% |
| Immigrants from South Eastern Asia | 89.0 /100 | #133 | Excellent 15.2% |
Portuguese Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Portuguese Data | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Data |
| Minimum | 0.18% | 1.0% |
| Maximum | 48.6% | 43.1% |
| Range | 48.4% | 42.1% |
| Mean | 19.4% | 16.1% |
| Median | 16.0% | 13.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.0% | 10.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 31.5% | 19.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 23.5% | 8.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.5% | 9.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.4% | 9.0% |
Correlation Details
| Portuguese Percentile | Sample Size | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.18% | 345,591,937 | 17.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.70% | 52,443,244 | 13.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.20% | 19,105,179 | 13.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.72% | 9,727,301 | 12.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.22% | 5,217,615 | 11.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.74% | 2,689,045 | 16.9% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.25% | 2,275,843 | 12.4% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.73% | 1,337,839 | 13.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.21% | 662,682 | 12.6% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.74% | 824,627 | 14.0% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.22% | 639,798 | 15.4% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.74% | 697,134 | 13.6% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.21% | 402,062 | 12.8% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.79% | 372,769 | 18.4% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.21% | 246,765 | 15.3% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.81% | 351,020 | 11.4% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.19% | 110,344 | 12.4% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.83% | 139,228 | 15.3% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.16% | 138,728 | 19.3% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.75% | 132,060 | 12.7% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.37% | 9,286 | 17.7% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.80% | 59,786 | 8.4% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.21% | 65,130 | 9.5% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.70% | 125,255 | 21.9% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.34% | 9,018 | 19.5% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.86% | 28,863 | 13.1% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.45% | 18,331 | 6.8% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.77% | 25,361 | 12.1% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.25% | 2,154 | 31.2% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.57% | 2,821 | 8.2% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.35% | 6,286 | 43.1% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.85% | 4,598 | 19.0% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.19% | 8,855 | 8.9% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.73% | 15,699 | 11.3% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.28% | 37,822 | 8.1% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.73% | 82,595 | 14.3% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.35% | 53,635 | 20.5% |
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.70% | 1,348 | 35.7% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.48% | 20,883 | 8.3% |
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.36% | 13,232 | 3.2% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.84% | 51,735 | 13.4% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.53% | 1,034 | 21.3% |
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.13% | 8,101 | 10.7% |
[ 28.0% - 28.5% ] 28.50% | 11,117 | 2.8% |
[ 28.5% - 29.0% ] 28.88% | 62,947 | 16.7% |
[ 29.0% - 29.5% ] 29.14% | 21,742 | 20.4% |
[ 30.5% - 31.0% ] 30.91% | 495 | 34.1% |
[ 31.0% - 31.5% ] 31.35% | 50,396 | 5.9% |
[ 31.5% - 32.0% ] 31.65% | 18,445 | 24.5% |
[ 32.0% - 32.5% ] 32.30% | 10,466 | 10.3% |
[ 32.5% - 33.0% ] 32.61% | 117,778 | 21.7% |
[ 33.0% - 33.5% ] 33.21% | 8,763 | 29.0% |
[ 33.5% - 34.0% ] 33.89% | 15,629 | 18.2% |
[ 35.0% - 35.5% ] 35.22% | 17,164 | 40.5% |
[ 36.0% - 36.5% ] 36.09% | 93,638 | 28.4% |
[ 37.0% - 37.5% ] 37.20% | 43,238 | 17.2% |
[ 37.5% - 38.0% ] 37.83% | 30,558 | 29.3% |
[ 38.0% - 38.5% ] 38.05% | 21,383 | 4.3% |
[ 38.5% - 39.0% ] 38.59% | 4,556 | 11.1% |
[ 39.0% - 39.5% ] 39.14% | 6,484 | 36.8% |
[ 41.0% - 41.5% ] 41.44% | 11,431 | 1.0% |
[ 43.0% - 43.5% ] 43.45% | 25,084 | 18.1% |
[ 48.0% - 48.5% ] 48.18% | 4,660 | 10.1% |
[ 48.5% - 49.0% ] 48.56% | 5,591 | 2.0% |