Luxembourger Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Luxembourger
Select to Compare
Single Male Poverty
Luxembourger Single Male Poverty
13.4%
POVERTY | SINGLE MALES
3.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
236th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Luxembourger Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 133,228,824 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.205 and weighted average of 13.4%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Luxembourgers within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 1.0% in poverty level among single males.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Luxembourgers and poverty level among single males does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Luxembourgers influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among single males within an area, or if Luxembourgers simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among single males due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Luxembourgers by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Bangladeshi (13.3%, a difference of 0.050%), British West Indian (13.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Canadian (13.3%, a difference of 0.15%), British (13.3%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Ghana (13.4%, a difference of 0.16%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Europeans | 6.2 /100 | #229 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Ghanaians | 6.1 /100 | #230 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Slavs | 5.3 /100 | #231 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Immigrants from Caribbean | 5.0 /100 | #232 | Tragic 13.3% |
| British | 4.0 /100 | #233 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Canadians | 4.0 /100 | #234 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Bangladeshis | 3.7 /100 | #235 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Luxembourgers | 3.6 /100 | #236 | Tragic 13.4% |
| British West Indians | 3.4 /100 | #237 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Immigrants from Ghana | 3.2 /100 | #238 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Czechoslovakians | 3.0 /100 | #239 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Belizeans | 2.3 /100 | #240 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Immigrants from Germany | 2.1 /100 | #241 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 2.1 /100 | #242 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Barbadians | 2.1 /100 | #243 | Tragic 13.4% |
Luxembourger Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Luxembourger Data | Single Male Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.025% | 4.0% |
| Maximum | 8.7% | 48.3% |
| Range | 8.7% | 44.3% |
| Mean | 2.6% | 22.6% |
| Median | 1.7% | 20.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 0.80% | 12.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.1% | 33.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.3% | 21.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.5% | 12.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.4% | 12.1% |
Correlation Details
| Luxembourger Percentile | Sample Size | Single Male Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.025% | 125,133,895 | 12.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.18% | 5,900,531 | 11.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.32% | 1,056,046 | 12.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.46% | 500,235 | 15.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.59% | 279,531 | 12.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.74% | 79,576 | 26.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.87% | 65,346 | 24.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.99% | 24,750 | 27.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.12% | 18,003 | 23.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.26% | 9,746 | 34.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.39% | 102,852 | 27.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.51% | 26,025 | 36.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.68% | 893 | 33.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.92% | 1,873 | 15.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.11% | 4,370 | 39.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.19% | 1,732 | 34.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.42% | 2,312 | 48.3% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.72% | 1,774 | 12.0% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.98% | 5,029 | 20.9% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.21% | 2,446 | 14.7% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.36% | 4,907 | 13.6% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.69% | 1,136 | 12.5% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.78% | 678 | 45.5% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.46% | 3,043 | 4.0% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.69% | 2,095 | 5.3% |