Guamanian/Chamorro Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Guamanian/Chamorro
Select to Compare
Single Male Poverty
Guamanian/Chamorro Single Male Poverty
12.2%
POVERTY | SINGLE MALES
97.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
98th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Guamanian/Chamorro Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,536,153 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Guamanians/Chamorros and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.602 and weighted average of 12.2%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Guamanians/Chamorros within a typical geography, there is an increase of 4.1% in poverty level among single males.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Guamanians/Chamorros and poverty level among single males does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Guamanians/Chamorros influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among single males within an area, or if Guamanians/Chamorros simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among single males due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Guamanians/Chamorros by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Guamanians/Chamorros are Immigrants from Italy (12.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Cuba (12.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Sweden (12.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Australia (12.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Latvia (12.2%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Immigrants from Turkey | 98.2 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Spanish American Indians | 98.0 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina | 97.9 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Colombians | 97.8 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Mongolians | 97.7 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants from Sweden | 97.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants from Italy | 97.4 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 97.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants from Cuba | 97.3 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants from Australia | 97.1 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants from Latvia | 97.0 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants from Europe | 97.0 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants from Armenia | 96.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants from Kazakhstan | 96.7 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Jordanians | 95.9 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Guamanian/Chamorro Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Guamanian/Chamorro Data | Single Male Poverty Data |
Minimum | 0.064% | 10.2% |
Maximum | 9.3% | 71.1% |
Range | 9.3% | 60.8% |
Mean | 3.1% | 25.1% |
Median | 2.3% | 17.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.2% | 11.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.9% | 29.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.7% | 17.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.7% | 18.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.6% | 17.8% |
Correlation Details
Guamanian/Chamorro Percentile | Sample Size | Single Male Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.064% | 181,084,864 | 12.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.33% | 17,640,146 | 11.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.58% | 4,736,996 | 11.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.83% | 2,059,155 | 12.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.08% | 1,079,800 | 12.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.30% | 287,608 | 11.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.55% | 304,495 | 12.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.78% | 106,652 | 10.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.03% | 105,102 | 11.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.20% | 47,423 | 15.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.47% | 11,433 | 40.7% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.71% | 11,754 | 27.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.98% | 6,773 | 19.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.28% | 18,059 | 28.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.44% | 27,926 | 29.4% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.29% | 210 | 57.1% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.27% | 1,611 | 71.1% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.50% | 920 | 59.1% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.30% | 4,648 | 25.9% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.34% | 578 | 22.2% |