Chickasaw vs Cheyenne Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Cheyenne
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Chickasaw
Cheyenne
16.3%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.1%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
315th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Cheyenne Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,053,704 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.328 and weighted average of 16.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 78,255,059 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Cheyenne and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.269 and weighted average of 16.1%, a difference of 1.3%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chickasaw | Cheyenne |
Minimum | 4.0% | 13.3% |
Maximum | 67.9% | 100.0% |
Range | 63.9% | 86.7% |
Mean | 25.6% | 44.4% |
Median | 23.1% | 38.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.6% | 18.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 31.0% | 60.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.5% | 41.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.7% | 30.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.6% | 29.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Cheyenne by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Chippewa (16.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Marshallese (16.4%, a difference of 0.78%), Black/African American (16.2%, a difference of 0.80%), Osage (16.5%, a difference of 0.91%), and Dutch West Indian (16.1%, a difference of 1.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cheyenne are Alaskan Athabascan (16.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Dutch West Indian (16.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Cherokee (16.1%, a difference of 0.33%), Black/African American (16.2%, a difference of 0.48%), and Comanche (16.0%, a difference of 0.56%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 15.6% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 15.7% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 15.8% |
Americans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 15.8% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 15.9% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 16.0% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 16.0% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 16.1% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 16.1% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 16.1% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 16.1% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.2% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.3% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.4% |
Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.4% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 16.5% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 16.7% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 16.9% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.0% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 17.2% |