Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Select to Compare
Single Male Poverty
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Single Male Poverty
12.1%
POVERTY | SINGLE MALES
98.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
84th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,451,408 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.699 and weighted average of 12.1%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 11.9% in poverty level among single males.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and poverty level among single males does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among single males within an area, or if Immigrants from Czechoslovakia simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among single males due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia are Immigrants from Chile (12.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Colombia (12.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from South America (12.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Turkish (12.1%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Israel (12.1%, a difference of 0.090%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Immigrants from Malaysia | 99.2 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants from Venezuela | 99.1 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants from Belgium | 99.0 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Armenians | 98.7 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants from South America | 98.7 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants from Colombia | 98.6 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants from Chile | 98.6 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | 98.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Turks | 98.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants from Israel | 98.5 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 12.1% |
South Americans | 98.5 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants from Eritrea | 98.5 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants from Ireland | 98.3 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 12.1% |
South American Indians | 98.3 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants from Turkey | 98.2 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Data | Single Male Poverty Data |
Minimum | 0.022% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 6.4% | 100.0% |
Range | 6.4% | 98.5% |
Mean | 1.3% | 24.8% |
Median | 0.98% | 16.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 0.49% | 11.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 1.7% | 30.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.2% | 18.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.2% | 20.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.2% | 20.2% |
Correlation Details
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Percentile | Sample Size | Single Male Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.022% | 125,144,274 | 11.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.072% | 34,510,704 | 11.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.13% | 9,256,041 | 11.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.19% | 4,044,423 | 12.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.24% | 2,297,218 | 12.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.30% | 958,219 | 12.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.36% | 771,020 | 11.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.41% | 350,760 | 9.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.45% | 226,985 | 15.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.52% | 236,854 | 11.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.57% | 183,840 | 10.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.62% | 168,588 | 11.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.67% | 40,199 | 15.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.75% | 113,848 | 12.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.79% | 31,401 | 23.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.86% | 2,437 | 28.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.90% | 8,756 | 28.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.96% | 18,936 | 15.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.00% | 19,212 | 20.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.09% | 6,954 | 42.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.14% | 14,006 | 17.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.15% | 4,861 | 25.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.23% | 2,679 | 3.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.30% | 3,319 | 50.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.33% | 1,734 | 26.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.40% | 7,480 | 23.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.50% | 7,209 | 44.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.92% | 2,500 | 31.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.98% | 1,518 | 75.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.11% | 2,034 | 57.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.18% | 1,975 | 10.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.46% | 2,436 | 36.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.54% | 4,135 | 32.7% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.76% | 2,208 | 1.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.17% | 1,009 | 27.8% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.42% | 1,636 | 100.0% |