Chickasaw vs Icelander Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Icelander
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Chickasaw
Icelanders
16.3%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.5%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
88.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
121st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Icelander Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,053,704 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.328 and weighted average of 16.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 148,220,666 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Icelanders and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.672 and weighted average of 12.5%, a difference of 31.0%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Icelander |
| Minimum | 4.0% | 9.1% |
| Maximum | 67.9% | 100.0% |
| Range | 63.9% | 90.9% |
| Mean | 25.6% | 37.1% |
| Median | 23.1% | 25.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.6% | 13.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 31.0% | 59.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.5% | 46.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.7% | 31.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.6% | 30.8% |
Similar Demographics by Single Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Chippewa (16.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Marshallese (16.4%, a difference of 0.78%), Black/African American (16.2%, a difference of 0.80%), Osage (16.5%, a difference of 0.91%), and Dutch West Indian (16.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.3% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.0% |
Demographics Similar to Icelanders by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Icelanders are Serbian (12.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Kenya (12.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Russian (12.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Jordan (12.5%, a difference of 0.15%), and Venezuelan (12.4%, a difference of 0.16%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Nicaraguans | 92.1 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 91.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 91.2 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 91.1 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Albanians | 90.6 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 90.3 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Venezuelans | 89.4 /100 | #120 | Excellent 12.4% |
| Icelanders | 88.2 /100 | #121 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Serbians | 87.9 /100 | #122 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 87.6 /100 | #123 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Russians | 87.3 /100 | #124 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 87.1 /100 | #125 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Romanians | 86.4 /100 | #126 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 86.2 /100 | #127 | Excellent 12.5% |
| Ecuadorians | 85.9 /100 | #128 | Excellent 12.5% |