Cajun Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Cajun
Select to Compare
Single Male Poverty
Cajun Single Male Poverty
19.1%
POVERTY | SINGLE MALES
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
330th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cajun Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 139,673,015 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Cajuns and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.485 and weighted average of 19.1%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cajuns within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.77% in poverty level among single males.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Cajuns and poverty level among single males does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Cajuns influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among single males within an area, or if Cajuns simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among single males due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Cajuns by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cajuns are Paiute (19.3%, a difference of 1.1%), Native/Alaskan (19.6%, a difference of 2.8%), Colville (18.4%, a difference of 3.5%), Kiowa (18.3%, a difference of 4.2%), and Inupiat (20.0%, a difference of 4.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants from Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 17.2% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 19.1% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 19.3% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 19.6% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 20.0% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 20.2% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 21.3% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 21.6% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 21.6% |
Cajun Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Cajun Data | Single Male Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.028% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 100.0% | 98.7% |
| Mean | 6.7% | 28.9% |
| Median | 4.3% | 23.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.0% | 15.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.7% | 35.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.7% | 19.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.7% | 20.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.6% | 19.9% |
Correlation Details
| Cajun Percentile | Sample Size | Single Male Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.028% | 124,993,823 | 12.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.18% | 7,097,431 | 15.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.31% | 2,670,591 | 18.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.43% | 1,070,929 | 22.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.57% | 645,173 | 18.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.69% | 543,823 | 16.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.82% | 416,278 | 18.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.96% | 235,941 | 28.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.05% | 253,447 | 23.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.21% | 137,168 | 15.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.36% | 96,217 | 16.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.47% | 158,735 | 17.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.61% | 113,635 | 22.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.70% | 60,441 | 35.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.86% | 131,573 | 16.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.95% | 141,983 | 20.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.08% | 65,195 | 25.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.19% | 18,706 | 32.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.32% | 56,623 | 11.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.46% | 65,910 | 19.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.61% | 78,035 | 29.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.78% | 49,132 | 15.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.86% | 4,410 | 38.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.01% | 38,497 | 10.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.08% | 91,252 | 14.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.22% | 109,658 | 27.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.37% | 55,691 | 23.2% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.53% | 538 | 69.2% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.62% | 2,761 | 6.5% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.70% | 16,526 | 29.3% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.01% | 29,975 | 12.5% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.25% | 6,498 | 16.3% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.36% | 734 | 11.1% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.51% | 25,917 | 12.2% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.60% | 1,347 | 73.3% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.80% | 7,286 | 24.8% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.97% | 2,880 | 9.6% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.13% | 19,497 | 9.5% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.34% | 8,745 | 47.6% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.38% | 2,231 | 34.6% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.56% | 5,108 | 38.9% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.96% | 2,300 | 24.0% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.02% | 7,223 | 78.8% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.28% | 3,297 | 39.4% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.72% | 16,937 | 78.6% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.22% | 11,726 | 21.7% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.34% | 30,530 | 21.4% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.50% | 4,335 | 30.4% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.88% | 2,347 | 13.6% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.95% | 1,069 | 36.8% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.13% | 2,459 | 78.1% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.50% | 13,329 | 18.5% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.78% | 1,766 | 62.4% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.29% | 915 | 36.8% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.43% | 23,891 | 36.7% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.69% | 423 | 35.7% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.47% | 1,518 | 25.0% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.71% | 1,046 | 34.8% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.01% | 2,215 | 1.3% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.06% | 9,326 | 45.2% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.92% | 1,220 | 29.4% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.57% | 3,338 | 10.9% |
[ 25.0% - 25.5% ] 25.47% | 1,441 | 31.2% |
[ 99.5% - 100.0% ] 100.00% | 24 | 100.0% |