Hmong Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Hmong
Select to Compare
Single Male Poverty
Hmong Single Male Poverty
14.2%
POVERTY | SINGLE MALES
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
280th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Hmong Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,410,058 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Hmong and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.531 and weighted average of 14.2%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hmong within a typical geography, there is an increase of 21.5% in poverty level among single males.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Hmong and poverty level among single males does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Hmong influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among single males within an area, or if Hmong simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among single males due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Hmong by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Hmong are Hispanic or Latino (14.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Spanish American (14.2%, a difference of 0.18%), Yaqui (14.2%, a difference of 0.34%), Indonesian (14.1%, a difference of 0.70%), and Slovak (14.1%, a difference of 0.74%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Welsh | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 14.0% |
Hondurans | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 14.0% |
English | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 14.1% |
Dutch | 0.1 /100 | #276 | Tragic 14.1% |
Immigrants from Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 14.1% |
Slovaks | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 14.1% |
Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 14.1% |
Hmong | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 14.2% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 14.2% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 14.2% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 14.2% |
Immigrants from Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 14.4% |
French | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 14.4% |
Celtics | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 14.5% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 14.5% |
Hmong Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Hmong Data | Single Male Poverty Data |
Minimum | 0.0014% | 3.8% |
Maximum | 1.4% | 66.7% |
Range | 1.4% | 62.9% |
Mean | 0.25% | 17.1% |
Median | 0.12% | 13.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 0.056% | 10.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 0.32% | 19.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.26% | 9.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.32% | 13.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.32% | 12.8% |
Correlation Details
Hmong Percentile | Sample Size | Single Male Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.0014% | 20,776,297 | 13.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.011% | 537,410 | 10.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.018% | 619,819 | 13.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.024% | 529,135 | 9.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.031% | 536,808 | 11.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.038% | 163,084 | 12.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.047% | 199,126 | 4.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.053% | 224,794 | 12.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.058% | 35,976 | 12.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.076% | 17,117 | 22.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.080% | 73,735 | 18.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.084% | 41,849 | 13.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.091% | 52,469 | 20.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.099% | 51,765 | 8.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.11% | 103,080 | 9.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.11% | 48,043 | 14.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.12% | 42,239 | 16.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.14% | 26,523 | 12.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.14% | 24,235 | 12.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.15% | 39,182 | 11.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.18% | 44,991 | 21.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.21% | 9,591 | 24.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.22% | 50,298 | 9.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.28% | 2,168 | 30.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.36% | 32,891 | 10.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.43% | 8,418 | 56.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.50% | 796 | 18.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.51% | 61,212 | 16.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.78% | 11,544 | 10.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.82% | 10,997 | 3.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.92% | 34,178 | 20.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.39% | 288 | 66.7% |