Immigrants from Zimbabwe Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Select to Compare
Single Male Poverty
Immigrants from Zimbabwe Single Male Poverty
13.2%
POVERTY | SINGLE MALES
82.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
230th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Zimbabwe Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 108,441,552 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.485 and weighted average of 13.2%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Zimbabwe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 10.0% in poverty level among single males.

It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and poverty level among single males does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Zimbabwe influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among single males within an area, or if Immigrants from Zimbabwe simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among single males due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Slavic (13.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Northern European (13.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Haiti (13.2%, a difference of 0.20%), British (13.2%, a difference of 0.26%), and Immigrants from Caribbean (13.2%, a difference of 0.32%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Barbadians | 83.0 /100 | #223 | Excellent 13.1% |
Cape Verdeans | 83.0 /100 | #224 | Excellent 13.1% |
Swedes | 83.0 /100 | #225 | Excellent 13.1% |
British West Indians | 82.9 /100 | #226 | Excellent 13.2% |
Immigrants from Caribbean | 82.8 /100 | #227 | Excellent 13.2% |
Immigrants from Haiti | 82.8 /100 | #228 | Excellent 13.2% |
Northern Europeans | 82.7 /100 | #229 | Excellent 13.2% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe | 82.7 /100 | #230 | Excellent 13.2% |
Slavs | 82.6 /100 | #231 | Excellent 13.2% |
British | 82.5 /100 | #232 | Excellent 13.2% |
Bhutanese | 82.3 /100 | #233 | Excellent 13.3% |
Belgians | 82.2 /100 | #234 | Excellent 13.3% |
Haitians | 82.2 /100 | #235 | Excellent 13.3% |
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar | 82.2 /100 | #236 | Excellent 13.3% |
Immigrants from the Azores | 82.0 /100 | #237 | Excellent 13.3% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Zimbabwe Data | Single Male Poverty Data |
Minimum | 0.018% | 6.6% |
Maximum | 4.8% | 100.0% |
Range | 4.7% | 93.4% |
Mean | 1.1% | 27.6% |
Median | 0.76% | 18.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 0.35% | 12.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 1.3% | 35.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.90% | 23.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.1% | 23.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.1% | 22.7% |
Correlation Details
Immigrants from Zimbabwe Percentile | Sample Size | Single Male Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.018% | 95,270,103 | 12.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.10% | 7,890,810 | 12.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.17% | 2,875,427 | 10.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.25% | 979,594 | 11.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.32% | 472,387 | 11.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.39% | 382,242 | 14.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.47% | 164,247 | 17.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.55% | 81,652 | 18.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.60% | 26,817 | 20.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.70% | 63,689 | 6.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.76% | 62,642 | 6.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.83% | 38,809 | 29.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.91% | 25,351 | 29.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.97% | 69,326 | 15.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.01% | 6,747 | 62.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.12% | 6,145 | 38.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.39% | 6,064 | 61.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.14% | 4,775 | 32.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.33% | 13,125 | 44.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.92% | 171 | 100.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.76% | 1,429 | 21.4% |