Chickasaw vs Sudanese Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Sudanese
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Chickasaw
Sudanese
16.3%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.1%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
17.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
207th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Sudanese Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,053,704 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.328 and weighted average of 16.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,028,362 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.482 and weighted average of 13.1%, a difference of 25.0%.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65407/654072916b9dff940fd6d46be963caa66db0f04b" alt="Chickasaw vs Sudanese Single Male Poverty"
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chickasaw | Sudanese |
Minimum | 4.0% | 2.5% |
Maximum | 67.9% | 77.6% |
Range | 63.9% | 75.0% |
Mean | 25.6% | 17.1% |
Median | 23.1% | 12.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.6% | 9.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 31.0% | 17.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.5% | 7.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.7% | 15.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.6% | 15.5% |
Similar Demographics by Single Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Chippewa (16.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Marshallese (16.4%, a difference of 0.78%), Black/African American (16.2%, a difference of 0.80%), Osage (16.5%, a difference of 0.91%), and Dutch West Indian (16.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 16.0% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 16.0% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 16.1% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 16.1% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 16.1% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 16.1% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.2% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.3% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.4% |
Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.4% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 16.5% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 16.7% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 16.9% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.0% |
Demographics Similar to Sudanese by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Sudanese are Immigrants from Western Africa (13.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Mexican American Indian (13.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Haiti (13.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Swedish (13.1%, a difference of 0.080%), and Northern European (13.0%, a difference of 0.10%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Slovenes | 21.6 /100 | #200 | Fair 13.0% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 21.4 /100 | #201 | Fair 13.0% |
Basques | 20.7 /100 | #202 | Fair 13.0% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 20.4 /100 | #203 | Fair 13.0% |
Estonians | 20.3 /100 | #204 | Fair 13.0% |
Poles | 19.3 /100 | #205 | Poor 13.0% |
Northern Europeans | 18.9 /100 | #206 | Poor 13.0% |
Sudanese | 17.7 /100 | #207 | Poor 13.1% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 17.6 /100 | #208 | Poor 13.1% |
Mexican American Indians | 17.5 /100 | #209 | Poor 13.1% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 16.8 /100 | #210 | Poor 13.1% |
Swedes | 16.8 /100 | #211 | Poor 13.1% |
Senegalese | 16.4 /100 | #212 | Poor 13.1% |
Italians | 15.9 /100 | #213 | Poor 13.1% |
Zimbabweans | 14.9 /100 | #214 | Poor 13.1% |