Inupiat Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Inupiat
Select to Compare
Single Male Poverty
Inupiat Single Male Poverty
20.0%
POVERTY | SINGLE MALES
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
333rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Inupiat Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,554,052 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Inupiat and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.074 and weighted average of 20.0%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Inupiat within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.046% in poverty level among single males.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Inupiat and poverty level among single males does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Inupiat influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among single males within an area, or if Inupiat simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among single males due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Inupiat by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Inupiat are Pima (20.2%, a difference of 0.80%), Native/Alaskan (19.6%, a difference of 1.9%), Paiute (19.3%, a difference of 3.6%), Cajun (19.1%, a difference of 4.8%), and Yuman (21.3%, a difference of 6.6%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 17.2% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 19.1% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 19.3% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 19.6% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 20.0% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 20.2% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 21.3% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 21.6% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 21.6% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 21.6% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 22.2% |
Inupiat Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Inupiat Data | Single Male Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.026% | 6.5% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 100.0% | 93.5% |
| Mean | 51.3% | 36.4% |
| Median | 58.4% | 33.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.6% | 16.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 90.2% | 53.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 84.6% | 37.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 39.2% | 24.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 38.8% | 24.3% |
Correlation Details
| Inupiat Percentile | Sample Size | Single Male Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.026% | 92,236,773 | 12.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.70% | 305,682 | 13.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.23% | 224,964 | 19.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.63% | 84,560 | 12.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.16% | 428,622 | 11.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.70% | 133,371 | 16.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.16% | 27,838 | 21.8% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.77% | 56,847 | 6.5% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.39% | 2,709 | 62.7% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.08% | 3,131 | 37.9% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.09% | 1,872 | 19.4% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.84% | 587 | 94.6% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.05% | 584 | 100.0% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.23% | 616 | 52.9% |
[ 19.5% - 20.0% ] 19.76% | 1,640 | 53.3% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.47% | 843 | 57.1% |
[ 26.0% - 26.5% ] 26.16% | 692 | 57.1% |
[ 52.0% - 52.5% ] 52.38% | 9,755 | 12.5% |
[ 56.0% - 56.5% ] 56.38% | 752 | 10.7% |
[ 56.5% - 57.0% ] 56.68% | 4,453 | 10.3% |
[ 58.0% - 58.5% ] 58.36% | 4,150 | 13.2% |
[ 66.5% - 67.0% ] 66.61% | 3,255 | 33.3% |
[ 69.5% - 70.0% ] 69.59% | 3,088 | 33.3% |
[ 74.0% - 74.5% ] 74.11% | 1,128 | 15.8% |
[ 75.5% - 76.0% ] 75.68% | 1,242 | 19.0% |
[ 79.5% - 80.0% ] 79.68% | 630 | 55.6% |
[ 82.5% - 83.0% ] 82.67% | 554 | 53.3% |
[ 84.5% - 85.0% ] 84.88% | 344 | 100.0% |
[ 85.0% - 85.5% ] 85.30% | 558 | 31.2% |
[ 87.5% - 88.0% ] 87.79% | 1,114 | 55.6% |
[ 89.0% - 89.5% ] 89.30% | 1,308 | 48.1% |
[ 91.0% - 91.5% ] 91.10% | 1,686 | 36.3% |
[ 92.5% - 93.0% ] 92.91% | 846 | 36.4% |
[ 93.5% - 94.0% ] 93.51% | 185 | 30.0% |
[ 94.0% - 94.5% ] 94.31% | 1,652 | 69.2% |
[ 94.5% - 95.0% ] 94.72% | 1,136 | 37.5% |
[ 95.5% - 96.0% ] 95.96% | 1,288 | 19.0% |
[ 96.5% - 97.0% ] 96.60% | 588 | 19.4% |
[ 97.0% - 97.5% ] 97.19% | 2,138 | 39.8% |
[ 98.0% - 98.5% ] 98.30% | 824 | 27.4% |
[ 99.5% - 100.0% ] 100.00% | 47 | 37.5% |