Chickasaw vs Ugandan Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Ugandan
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Chickasaw
Ugandans
16.3%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.3%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
94.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
109th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Ugandan Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,053,704 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.328 and weighted average of 16.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 90,762,990 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.158 and weighted average of 12.3%, a difference of 32.5%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Ugandan |
| Minimum | 4.0% | 2.3% |
| Maximum | 67.9% | 38.5% |
| Range | 63.9% | 36.1% |
| Mean | 25.6% | 11.1% |
| Median | 23.1% | 10.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.6% | 5.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 31.0% | 13.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.5% | 7.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.7% | 8.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.6% | 7.9% |
Similar Demographics by Single Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Chippewa (16.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Marshallese (16.4%, a difference of 0.78%), Black/African American (16.2%, a difference of 0.80%), Osage (16.5%, a difference of 0.91%), and Dutch West Indian (16.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.3% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.0% |
Demographics Similar to Ugandans by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Immigrants from Eastern Africa (12.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Iraqi (12.3%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Portugal (12.3%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (12.3%, a difference of 0.24%), and Kenyan (12.4%, a difference of 0.30%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Europe | 97.0 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 96.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 96.7 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Jordanians | 95.9 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 95.6 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Iraqis | 95.1 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 95.0 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Ugandans | 94.5 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 93.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 93.6 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Kenyans | 93.3 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Pakistanis | 92.4 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Nicaraguans | 92.1 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 91.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 91.2 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 12.4% |