Chickasaw vs Apache Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Apache
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Chickasaw
Apache
16.3%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.6%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
337th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Apache Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,053,704 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.328 and weighted average of 16.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,687,885 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Apache and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.330 and weighted average of 21.6%, a difference of 32.2%.

Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chickasaw | Apache |
Minimum | 4.0% | 8.2% |
Maximum | 67.9% | 100.0% |
Range | 63.9% | 91.8% |
Mean | 25.6% | 49.1% |
Median | 23.1% | 45.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.6% | 24.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 31.0% | 64.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.5% | 39.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.7% | 28.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.6% | 27.9% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Apache by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Chippewa (16.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Marshallese (16.4%, a difference of 0.78%), Black/African American (16.2%, a difference of 0.80%), Osage (16.5%, a difference of 0.91%), and Shoshone (16.7%, a difference of 2.2%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Apache are Tohono O'odham (21.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Yuman (21.3%, a difference of 1.3%), Pima (20.2%, a difference of 7.1%), Inupiat (20.0%, a difference of 7.9%), and Native/Alaskan (19.6%, a difference of 10.0%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.2% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.3% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.4% |
Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.4% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 16.5% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 16.7% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 16.9% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.0% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 17.2% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 17.7% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 18.3% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 18.4% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 19.1% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 19.3% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 19.6% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 20.0% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 20.2% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 21.3% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 21.6% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 21.6% |