South American Indian Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
South American Indian
Select to Compare
Single Male Poverty
South American Indian Single Male Poverty
12.1%
POVERTY | SINGLE MALES
98.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
90th/ 347
METRIC RANK
South American Indian Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 154,904,356 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of South American Indians and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.691 and weighted average of 12.1%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in South American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 9.7% in poverty level among single males.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of South American Indians and poverty level among single males does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of South American Indians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among single males within an area, or if South American Indians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among single males due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to South American Indians by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to South American Indians are Immigrants from Ireland (12.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Turkey (12.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Spanish American Indian (12.1%, a difference of 0.16%), South American (12.1%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Eritrea (12.1%, a difference of 0.18%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Immigrants from Chile | 98.6 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | 98.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Turks | 98.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants from Israel | 98.5 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 12.1% |
South Americans | 98.5 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants from Eritrea | 98.5 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants from Ireland | 98.3 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 12.1% |
South American Indians | 98.3 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants from Turkey | 98.2 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Spanish American Indians | 98.0 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina | 97.9 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Colombians | 97.8 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Mongolians | 97.7 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants from Sweden | 97.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants from Italy | 97.4 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.2% |
South American Indian Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | South American Indian Data | Single Male Poverty Data |
Minimum | 0.038% | 5.4% |
Maximum | 5.9% | 100.0% |
Range | 5.9% | 94.6% |
Mean | 1.7% | 20.7% |
Median | 1.3% | 12.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 0.63% | 9.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.7% | 27.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.0% | 17.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.5% | 21.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.5% | 21.1% |
Correlation Details
South American Indian Percentile | Sample Size | Single Male Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.038% | 139,816,837 | 12.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.20% | 10,417,196 | 11.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.33% | 2,593,829 | 11.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.48% | 813,480 | 13.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.63% | 658,419 | 9.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.78% | 160,028 | 10.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.93% | 76,687 | 9.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.09% | 121,777 | 13.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.20% | 45,013 | 11.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.32% | 95,956 | 9.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.48% | 30,969 | 19.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.60% | 15,368 | 27.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.80% | 12,935 | 27.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.22% | 33,691 | 5.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.66% | 1,015 | 45.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.77% | 1,658 | 30.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.95% | 6,299 | 18.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.74% | 2,829 | 8.2% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.95% | 370 | 100.0% |