Chickasaw vs South American Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
South American
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Chickasaw
South Americans
16.3%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.1%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
98.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
87th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs South American Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,053,704 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.328 and weighted average of 16.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 426,067,746 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of South Americans and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.096 and weighted average of 12.1%, a difference of 34.9%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | South American |
| Minimum | 4.0% | 0.77% |
| Maximum | 67.9% | 27.8% |
| Range | 63.9% | 27.1% |
| Mean | 25.6% | 11.5% |
| Median | 23.1% | 11.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.6% | 9.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 31.0% | 13.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.5% | 4.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.7% | 4.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.6% | 4.0% |
Similar Demographics by Single Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Chippewa (16.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Marshallese (16.4%, a difference of 0.78%), Black/African American (16.2%, a difference of 0.80%), Osage (16.5%, a difference of 0.91%), and Dutch West Indian (16.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.3% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.0% |
Demographics Similar to South Americans by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to South Americans are Immigrants from Eritrea (12.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Israel (12.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Turkish (12.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (12.1%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Chile (12.1%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Armenians | 98.7 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | South America | 98.7 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 98.6 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 98.6 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Turks | 98.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 98.5 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| South Americans | 98.5 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 98.5 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 98.3 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| South American Indians | 98.3 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 98.2 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Spanish American Indians | 98.0 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 97.9 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Colombians | 97.8 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 12.2% |