Chickasaw vs Yup'ik Family Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Yup'ik
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Chickasaw
Yup'ik
10.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
256th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.7%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
344th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Yup'ik Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,601,652 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.000 and weighted average of 10.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,939,403 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Yup'ik and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.639 and weighted average of 18.7%, a difference of 72.5%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Yup'ik |
| Minimum | 3.7% | 3.7% |
| Maximum | 33.3% | 49.0% |
| Range | 29.7% | 45.2% |
| Mean | 12.7% | 20.8% |
| Median | 12.0% | 19.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.8% | 8.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.5% | 30.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.7% | 21.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.3% | 12.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.2% | 12.6% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Ghana (10.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Subsaharan African (10.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Mexican American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Liberia (10.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and Bangladeshi (10.9%, a difference of 0.46%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Cubans | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 10.6% |
| Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 10.9% |
Demographics Similar to Yup'ik by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Yup'ik are Navajo (18.8%, a difference of 0.55%), Pima (18.4%, a difference of 1.8%), Immigrants from Yemen (17.5%, a difference of 7.1%), Puerto Rican (20.3%, a difference of 8.6%), and Tohono O'odham (20.4%, a difference of 9.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 18.7% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 18.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 20.3% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 20.4% |