Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Africa Family Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Africa
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Africa
10.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
256th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.9%
FAMILY POVERTY
4.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
223rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Africa Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,601,652 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.000 and weighted average of 10.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 467,521,718 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Africa and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.577 and weighted average of 9.9%, a difference of 9.3%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Africa |
| Minimum | 3.7% | 2.2% |
| Maximum | 33.3% | 42.2% |
| Range | 29.7% | 40.0% |
| Mean | 12.7% | 13.1% |
| Median | 12.0% | 10.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.8% | 8.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.5% | 14.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.7% | 5.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.3% | 7.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.2% | 7.3% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Ghana (10.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Subsaharan African (10.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Mexican American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Liberia (10.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and Bangladeshi (10.9%, a difference of 0.46%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Cubans | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 10.6% |
| Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 10.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Africa by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Africa are Japanese (9.9%, a difference of 0.30%), Marshallese (9.9%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Cambodia (9.9%, a difference of 0.33%), Immigrants (10.0%, a difference of 0.55%), and Bermudan (9.9%, a difference of 0.61%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Moroccans | 6.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 9.8% |
| Americans | 6.2 /100 | #217 | Tragic 9.8% |
| Panamanians | 5.6 /100 | #218 | Tragic 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 5.4 /100 | #219 | Tragic 9.9% |
| Bermudans | 5.3 /100 | #220 | Tragic 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 4.8 /100 | #221 | Tragic 9.9% |
| Japanese | 4.8 /100 | #222 | Tragic 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 4.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 9.9% |
| Marshallese | 3.9 /100 | #224 | Tragic 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 3.6 /100 | #225 | Tragic 10.0% |
| Ottawa | 3.3 /100 | #226 | Tragic 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 3.3 /100 | #227 | Tragic 10.0% |
| Sudanese | 3.1 /100 | #228 | Tragic 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 3.1 /100 | #229 | Tragic 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 3.1 /100 | #230 | Tragic 10.0% |