Immigrants from Philippines Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Philippines
Select to Compare
Family Poverty
Immigrants from Philippines Family Poverty
8.0%
POVERTY | FAMILIES
96.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
95th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Philippines Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 469,729,486 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Philippines and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.163 and weighted average of 8.0%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Philippines within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.054% in poverty level among families.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Philippines and poverty level among families does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Philippines influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among families within an area, or if Immigrants from Philippines simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among families due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Philippines by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Philippines are Immigrants from Pakistan (8.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Turkey (8.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Tlingit-Haida (8.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Czechoslovakian (8.0%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Switzerland (8.1%, a difference of 0.43%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Serbians | 97.2 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants from Denmark | 97.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants from England | 97.1 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants from Italy | 97.0 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Czechoslovakians | 96.8 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 96.7 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants from Pakistan | 96.6 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants from Philippines | 96.5 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants from Turkey | 96.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants from Switzerland | 96.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Immigrants from South Africa | 95.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Welsh | 95.8 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| New Zealanders | 95.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Immigrants from Norway | 95.7 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Immigrants from Indonesia | 95.7 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants from Philippines Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Philippines Data | Family Poverty Data |
| Minimum | 0.21% | 1.1% |
| Maximum | 66.7% | 24.5% |
| Range | 66.5% | 23.5% |
| Mean | 15.9% | 7.7% |
| Median | 14.2% | 7.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.0% | 5.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.6% | 8.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.6% | 3.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.1% | 4.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.0% | 3.9% |
Correlation Details
| Immigrants from Philippines Percentile | Sample Size | Family Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.21% | 295,905,736 | 9.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.70% | 80,675,194 | 8.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.23% | 28,656,801 | 7.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.72% | 17,107,860 | 7.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.23% | 13,488,334 | 8.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.71% | 8,706,520 | 7.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.21% | 8,045,207 | 7.0% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.78% | 3,507,644 | 8.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.24% | 3,111,897 | 7.8% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.71% | 1,736,075 | 8.3% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.20% | 711,858 | 7.6% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.77% | 1,387,842 | 7.6% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.20% | 989,384 | 8.1% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.76% | 774,880 | 7.7% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.28% | 526,793 | 5.5% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.72% | 875,138 | 6.8% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.17% | 732,356 | 8.2% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.66% | 247,639 | 5.4% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.21% | 274,383 | 5.3% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.71% | 10,409 | 10.9% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.22% | 154,825 | 4.5% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.68% | 1,666 | 24.5% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.23% | 98,961 | 7.4% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.66% | 265,513 | 9.8% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.28% | 421,339 | 5.4% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.79% | 116,900 | 5.5% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.15% | 27,278 | 8.2% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.71% | 184,375 | 8.6% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.15% | 152,755 | 6.7% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.73% | 52,271 | 7.6% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.14% | 3,766 | 13.7% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.88% | 48,452 | 4.3% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.13% | 130,052 | 5.5% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.82% | 220 | 19.6% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.35% | 4,656 | 12.7% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.22% | 4,628 | 11.4% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.84% | 12,906 | 10.6% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.04% | 1,376 | 7.3% |
[ 19.5% - 20.0% ] 19.86% | 65,125 | 4.6% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.28% | 208,714 | 4.8% |
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.61% | 6,531 | 2.6% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.94% | 20,127 | 4.2% |
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.22% | 2,255 | 7.9% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.94% | 7,179 | 5.2% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.16% | 3,800 | 9.1% |
[ 24.0% - 24.5% ] 24.18% | 28,593 | 4.7% |
[ 24.5% - 25.0% ] 24.71% | 52,328 | 9.7% |
[ 25.0% - 25.5% ] 25.49% | 25,902 | 2.6% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.90% | 72,605 | 6.9% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.79% | 922 | 1.1% |
[ 27.0% - 27.5% ] 27.24% | 16,457 | 5.4% |
[ 27.5% - 28.0% ] 27.75% | 7,922 | 16.7% |
[ 31.0% - 31.5% ] 31.18% | 3,576 | 2.4% |
[ 33.5% - 34.0% ] 33.96% | 45,457 | 10.2% |
[ 34.0% - 34.5% ] 34.06% | 4,342 | 2.9% |
[ 47.5% - 48.0% ] 47.52% | 766 | 6.0% |
[ 66.5% - 67.0% ] 66.69% | 2,996 | 6.2% |