Chickasaw vs Ghanaian Family Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Ghanaian
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Chickasaw
Ghanaians
10.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
256th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.3%
FAMILY POVERTY
1.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
241st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Ghanaian Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,601,652 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.000 and weighted average of 10.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 190,166,438 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Ghanaians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.096 and weighted average of 10.3%, a difference of 5.5%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Ghanaian |
| Minimum | 3.7% | 2.3% |
| Maximum | 33.3% | 26.7% |
| Range | 29.7% | 24.4% |
| Mean | 12.7% | 9.9% |
| Median | 12.0% | 9.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.8% | 6.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.5% | 11.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.7% | 5.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.3% | 5.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.2% | 5.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Ghanaians by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Ghana (10.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Subsaharan African (10.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Liberia (10.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Ecuadorian (10.8%, a difference of 0.64%), and Immigrants from Western Africa (10.7%, a difference of 0.94%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ghanaians are Immigrants from the Azores (10.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Potawatomi (10.2%, a difference of 0.39%), French American Indian (10.2%, a difference of 0.43%), Alaska Native (10.4%, a difference of 0.86%), and Nepalese (10.4%, a difference of 1.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| French American Indians | 1.5 /100 | #238 | Tragic 10.2% |
| Potawatomi | 1.5 /100 | #239 | Tragic 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 1.4 /100 | #240 | Tragic 10.3% |
| Ghanaians | 1.3 /100 | #241 | Tragic 10.3% |
| Alaska Natives | 1.0 /100 | #242 | Tragic 10.4% |
| Nepalese | 0.8 /100 | #243 | Tragic 10.4% |
| Cree | 0.7 /100 | #244 | Tragic 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 10.5% |
| Cherokee | 0.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 10.6% |
| Liberians | 0.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 10.6% |
| Nicaraguans | 0.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 10.6% |
| Cubans | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 10.6% |
| Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 10.9% |